哲學家指出，認定同意制可能違背意願假如死者生前無表明反對。但其真正意願

哲學家指出，認定同意制可能違背意願假如死者生前無表明反對。但其真正意願是不捐贈器官。雖然明確同意制也可能違背意願假若死者生前無表明捐贈，其實願意捐贈。相比之下，前者出錯的後果較為嚴重，因為人有器官不被拿取的自主權利。認定同意制有機會侵犯這種權利，而明確同意制不會。

結果 (英文) 1:

Philosophers point out that the system might agree identified against their will if the deceased is no suggestion that opposition. But it is not true willingness to donate organs. Although explicit consent system may also be against the will of the donation if the deceased is no suggestion that, in fact, are willing to donate. By contrast, the former is the more serious consequences of error, because people have the right to autonomy is not an organ of the pick. Identification system agreed to have the opportunity to infringe this right, and the system will not express consent.

結果 (英文) 2:

Philosophers point out that the system of consent may be against will if the deceased did not express an objection in his life. But its real will is not to donate organs. Although the explicit consent system may also be against the will, if the deceased did not indicate a donation before life, in fact, willing to donate. In contrast, the consequences of the former error are more serious, because people have the right to be autonomous organs not to be taken. It is determined that the consent system has an opportunity to violate this right, while the system of explicit consent does not.

結果 (英文) 3:

Philosophers have pointed out that the determination of consent system may be against the will if the deceased does not express opposition before his death. But its real intention is not to donate organs. Although the explicit consent system may also be against the will of the deceased, if the deceased does not indicate the donation before his death, he is actually willing to donate. In contrast, the consequences of the former's mistakes are more serious, because people have the independent right not to take organs. It holds that consent system has an opportunity to violate this right, while explicit consent system does not.