However, there is no data available

However, there is no data available
whether the theoretical advantages of MR guidance can be translated into a clinical benefit for patients in comparison with other
modalities of image guidance. Out study is a first attempt to
compare CT-guided and MR-guided RF ablation. In the presented
retrospective study MR-guided RF ablation showed a significant
higher rate of primary technique effectiveness (96.3%) compared
to CT-guided RF ablation (79.3%). Secondary technique effectiveness assessed within 4 months after a facultative second ablation
procedure was without a significant difference between CT guidance (89.7%) and MR guidance (96.3%). We suppose that MR-guided
RF ablation offers a more precise targeting and monitoring leading
to a locally more effective ablation therapy after a single session in
comparison to CT-guided RF ablation. Monitoring by MR imaging
is especially advantageous if overlapping ablations are required to
complete ablation therapy

結果 (中文) 1:

然而，那里是没有数据可用是否先生指导的理论优势可以转化为临床受益的患者与其他图像制导方式。研究是第一次尝试比较 CT 引导下和 MR 引导下射频消融治疗。在提出回顾性研究 MR 引导下射频消融显著率的主要技术有效性 （96.3%) 较的高CT 引导下射频消融 （79.3%)。二次技术有效性评估兼性的第二次消融术后 4 个月内程序是无 CT 引导 （89.7%) 和先生指导 （96.3%) 之间的显著差异。我们假设 MR 引导下射频消融治疗提供更精确定位和监测领先到本地更有效的消融治疗后在单个会话CT 引导下射频消融的比较。监测的磁共振成像是特别有利的如果重叠消融均须完整的消融治疗

結果 (中文) 3:

然而，没有可用的数据磁共振引导的理论优势是否可以转化为与其他患者相比的临床获益图像引导方式。进行研究是第一次尝试CT引导下射频消融与射频消融治疗的比较。在介绍回顾性研究磁共振引导下射频消融治疗表现出显著性较高的主要技术有效率（96.3%）比较CT引导下射频消融（79.3%）。中等技术的有效性评估的4个月内兼二消融后程序是没有显着差异的CT指导（89.7%）和磁共振指导（96.3%）。我们假设他引导射频消融提供了一个更精确的定位和监测领先到一个局部更有效的消融治疗后，在一个单一的会话CT引导下射频消融的比较。磁共振成像监测如果是特别有利的消融需要完全消融治疗