While this may seem like a great lo

While this may seem like a great loss of efficiency, it should be remembered that around 90% of cases filed do not go to trial at all because of dismissals on procedural grounds, summary judgments and settlements, and only some of the trials in the 10% of cases that do go to trial are jury trials. The author of the study of Manhattan courts sought to determine a "price tag" for the efficiency gains that would result from abolishing jury trials in the state trial courts for New York City and found that the same gains would result from adding 1.6 more judges or by requiring judges to work for two weeks of their three month summer vacation. Whether this cost is a large cost when compared to the benefits of juries is a matter of judgment. Based on the stated comparisons, the author of the study concluded that "the jury is being sold for too low a price."'

結果 (繁體中文) 2:

雖然這似乎是效率的巨大損失，但應該記住，大約90%的案件完全不進入審判，因為基於程式理由、即決判決和和解的駁回，而且只有10%的案件中的一些審判。 審判是陪審團的審判曼哈頓法院研究的作者試圖確定紐約市州審判法院取消陪審團審判後效率收益的"價格標籤"，併發現增加1.6名法官或重新增加法官也會帶來同樣的收益。要求法官在三個月的暑假裡工作兩周。與陪審團的利益相比，這種成本是否是一個很大的成本，這是一個判斷的問題。根據上述比較，該研究的作者得出結論："陪審團被以過低的價格出售。

結果 (繁體中文) 3:

雖然這似乎是一個巨大的效率損失，但應該記住，大約90%的立案案件根本不去審判，因為程式上的理由，即决判决和解决解雇，只有10%的案件中的一些審判是陪審團審判。《曼哈頓法院研究報告》的作者試圖確定紐約市州審判法院取消陪審團審判所帶來的效率收益的“價格標籤”，並發現新增1.6名法官或要求法官在三個月的暑假中工作兩周也會帶來同樣的收益。與陪審團的利益相比，這一成本是否是一個很大的成本是一個判斷的問題。基於上述比較，研究報告的作者得出結論：“陪審團的價格太低了。”