The consecutive application of the

The consecutive application of the original El Centro earthquake
record with varying amplitude scales enabled the assessment of the
effects of increasing peak ground acceleration on the tested GRS
wall configurations. In general, measured accelerations increased
from the bottom to the top on the wall face and from the back to the
front on top of the wall, as reported in the literature. Accelerations
measured by the uppermost accelerometer on the face and the front
accelerometer on the top were the highest.
Amplification factors were calculated by dividing the peak acceleration
measured during shaking at the instrumented location on
the wall face by the peak shaking table acceleration. The peak values
measured were not necessarily concurrent. Fig. 3 shows the change
in amplification factors for configuration 1. Fig. 3 illustrates that
constant amplification factors may be assumed for the lower parts of
the wall face. The behavior became nonlinear closer to the top of the
wall; amplification factors decreased with increasing shaking table
acceleration. This decrease in amplification factors at the top were
observed for the configurations 1–3 and for Part 1 of the test on
configuration 4. The highest amplification factors observed were in
the range of 1.5–2 for these tests.
Extremely large amplifications were measured by the uppermost
accelerometer on the face and the front accelerometer on top in Part 2
of the test on configuration 4, where the input acceleration record
was doubled, as explained previously. These extreme measurements
implied high-frequency vibrations of the top facing blocks because
of the loosening of the connection between the top two rows of
facing blocks, which were fixed in the first part of the test.
Similarly, very high accelerations were recorded at the top of the
wall face in the tests on configurations 5 and 6, indicating highfrequency
vibrations of the top blocks that were not fixed to the
more stable lower blocks. Figs. 4 and 5 show the change in
amplification factors with increasing peak shaking table acceleration
for the tests on configurations 4 (Part 2) and 5, excluding the top part
undergoing high-frequency vibrations. Constant amplification
factors may be assumed up to the top of the wall, but amplification
factors are more variable near the top.
With the top block layers left unfixed, the increase in reinforcement
length from 85 cm (configuration 6) to 145 cm (con-
figuration 7) prevented the high-frequency vibrations of the top
facing blocks. Variation of amplification factors with changing peak
shaking table acceleration for the test on configuration 7 is shown in
Fig. 6. For this configuration and for configuration 8, which was the
top rows’ fixed version of configuration 7, the amplification factor at
the top of the wall face increased with increasing peak shaking table
acceleration.

結果 (繁體中文) 1:

連續地震中的應用原始埃爾森特羅記錄與振幅大大小小啟用的評估增加對測試 GRS 的地面峰值加速度的影響牆上的配置。一般情況下，實測的加速度增加從底部到頂部牆臉上和回在城牆上，正如在文獻中報導的前面。加速度用在臉上和前面的最上部加速度計測量加速度計在頂部是最高的。除以峰值加速度計算了放大係數在檢測位置上劇烈晃動時測量牆面的搖表加速度峰值。最大值測量並不一定併發。圖 3 顯示了更改在配置 1 的放大係數。圖 3 所示，不斷放大因素可能假設的下部牆上的臉。行為成為了非線性接近到頂部牆上;放大係數隨振動臺加速度。頂部的放大係數的降低了觀察到的配置 1 — — 3 和試驗第 1 部分配置 4。觀察到的最高放大因素是在1.5-2 為這些測試的範圍。極大的滾雪球法測定至上在臉上和在第 2 部分的頂部前加速度計加速度計測試組態 4，在哪裡輸入的加速度記錄的增加了一倍，正如以前解釋。這些極端的測量隱含的高頻振動的頂端面臨塊，因為鬆動的前兩行之間的連接面對塊，其中被固定在測試的第一部分。同樣，頂部的錄得很高的加速度牆面上配置 5 和 6，指示高頻測試中不固定的頂塊振動更穩定的下層塊。圖 4 和圖 5 顯示的變化放大係數隨峰搖表加速度在配置 (部分 2) 4 和 5 上測試，不包括的上半部分正在進行的高頻率振動。不斷放大因素可能假定到牆上，但是放大的頂部因素是頂部附近的多個變數。與左側頂塊層未固定，在加固增加長度從 85 釐米 （配置 6） 到 145 釐米 （con-成形 7） 防止頂部的高頻率振動面對塊。放大因數隨峰值變化搖表加速度測試組態 7 所示圖 6。對於此配置和配置 8，這是配置 7，在放大倍數的頂行固定的版本頂部的牆臉隨增加峰值振動臺加速度。

結果 (繁體中文) 2:

原來埃爾森特羅地震的連續應用
有不同幅度秤記錄啟用的評估
上測試GRS增加峰值加速度的影響
牆配置。在一般情況下，測得的加速度增加
從底部到頂端上的壁面和從後面到
前面的壁的頂部，如在文獻中報導。加速度
通過面部的最上的加速度計和跟前測定
的頂部加速度計最高。
擴增因子除以峰值加速度計算
上的儀表位置搖動期間測量
由峰搖床加速度的壁面。峰值
測量不一定並發。圖。圖3顯示了變化
配置圖中的放大係數。圖3示出了
恆定的放大係數可以假設為的下部
的壁面。的行為變成了非線性接近的頂
壁; 放大係數隨振動台下降
加速。被這在頂部下降放大因子
觀察到的配置1-3和在試驗1部分
配置4.觀察分別在最高放大因子
的1.5-2這些測試的範圍內。
通過測量非常大的擴增最上面
的面部和第2部分在頂部前面加速度計的加速度計
上配置4的試驗，其中所述輸入加速度記錄
了一倍，如前所述。這些極端測量
暗示朝向因為塊的頂部的高頻率振動
的頂部兩行之間的連接鬆動的
面向塊，其分別固定在試驗的第一部分。
同樣的，非常高的加速度在頂部被記錄的
在上的配置5和6的測試壁面，指示高頻
了未固定在頂端塊的振動
更穩定下層塊。圖 4和5表示在變更
與增加的峰值振動台加速度的放大係數
對配置4（第2部分）和5的試驗中，不包括頂部部分
進行高頻振動。常數放大
因子可以假定達到壁的頂部，但放大
因子是靠近頂部更多的變量。
隨著頂塊層留未定影，在加固的增加
長度85厘米（配置6）至145厘米（CON-
成形7）防止頂端的高頻率振動
面向塊。的放大係數與變化的峰值變化
搖床加速度對配置7試驗示於
圖 6.對於該結構和配置8，這是
頂行'配置7的固定版本，在放大因子
的壁面的頂端與增加的峰值振動台增加
加速。

結果 (繁體中文) 3:

the application of the original連續地震中心創紀錄的大尺度with varying enabled the Assessment of the地面加速度峰值effects of increasing GRS tested on the牆的配寘。在一般情况下，進行量測的新增from the Bottom to the Top on the Wall and from the Back to the臉在頂部的前端華爾，as reported in the literature。進行我們量測uppermost accelerometer by the the face and the frontaccelerometer on the Top were the highest。calculated by dividing the factors were放大加速度峰值振動量測在我們instrumented location at the華爾臉by the峰的振動加速度錶。The peak values量測were not necessarily競爭對手。圖3顯示改變。在放大factors for Configuration 1。圖3說明恒定的放大因素may be assumed for the lower parts of華爾街。非線性行為became the closer to the Top of the放大因數的降低與新增牆；顫抖的桌子加速。這頂decrease in，at the factors were1–3 configurations and for the observed of the test for Part 1我們配寘4。observed were in the highest放大因數1.5–2 for the range of these測試。非常大的量測uppermost擴增were by the我們accelerometer the face and the額頭頂在我們accelerometer Part 2我們配寘4 of the test，where the輸入加速度記錄以前是雙重的，解釋。這些極端的量測隱含的高頻振動器頂塊because of the松of the Top of the connection between the two of行針對固定塊，which were in the first part of the測試。同樣，were recorded at the very high進行Top of the我們華爾face in the測試顯示設定的5和6，高頻振動of the頂塊固定that were not to the下下更穩定。圖。4和5的show the change in放大的振動加速度峰值錶factors with increasing我們測試的配寘為4和5（Part 2），不包括頂部的地方undergoing高頻率的振動。恒定的放大因素may be assumed up to the Top of the Wall，但放大near the factors are more變數上。層頂塊內with the increase in the left，强化85釐米（長度從配寘到145釐米（6）。7）、高頻振動prevented the Top of the面向塊。with variation of Changing峰放大因數我們的振動加速度錶測試7 for the configuration is shown in圖6。for this and for Configuration配寘8，which was the固定頂行版本的配寘7 at the放大係數牆頂面with increasing of the increased振動峰錶加速。