None of the algorithms to predict b

None of the algorithms to predict blood loss and
transfusion needs in TJA proposed so far7,22-26 appear to
be widely effective16,27. According to our data, the simple
measurement of basal haemoglobin concentration could
be sufficient to effectively reduce non-used autologous
and allogeneic blood units, as already suggested
elsewhere28,29. Specifically, if autologous blood were
requested only for patients with a baseline haemoglobin
concentration below a threshold of 14.65 g/dL, a total
of 83 requested and non-used allogeneic blood units
(31.7%) would have been saved, while only one patient
(0.4%, THA) would have needed an emergency request
for blood. The threshold calculated for the PABD
patients was higher (15.85 g/dL). Use of this threshold
trigger in blood transfusion decision-making would
have saved only 9.5% of discarded units (15 out of
157), while two patients (1.1%) would have needed an
emergency request for blood units. Furthermore, there
appears no reason to adopt different threshold triggers
for PABD+PCS and PCS only patients, as their starting
conditions are identical.

結果 (中文) 1:

没有一个算法来预测失血和TJA 提出这么 far7，22-26 的输血需求出现被广泛 effective16，27。根据我们的数据，简单基部的血红蛋白浓度的测量可以不足以有效地减少非-用于自体和同种异体血单位，正如已经建议elsewhere28，29。具体来说，自体血要是只要求患者基线血红蛋白浓度低于阈值的 14.65 g/dL，共83 要求和非使用同种异体血单位（31.7%) 就会得救，而只有一个病人（0.4%，THA) 就需要有一项紧急要求为血。阈值计算为 PABD患者为高 (15.85 g/dL)。此阈值的使用触发器在输血决策会已保存只有 9.5%的废弃单位 (15 个157)，而需要有两个病人 （1.1%)血液单位的紧急请求。此外，那里似乎没有理由采用不同的阈值触发器PABD + PC 和 PC 唯一的病人，为他们的起始条件是相同的。

結果 (中文) 3:

没有的算法来预测失血和在提出far7,22-26 TJA出现输血需求被广泛effective16,27。根据我们的数据，简单基础血红蛋白浓度的测定足以有效地减少非使用自体和异体血液单位，正如已经建议elsewhere28,29。具体来说，如果自体血仅要求基线血红蛋白的患者浓度低于阈值的14.65克/升，总83要求和非使用的异基因造血单位（31.7%）会被救，而只有一个病人（0.4%，）将有必要的紧急要求血液。计算PABD阈值患者高（15.85克/升）。使用这个阈值触发器在输血决策中的应用只保存了9.5%个丢弃的单位（15个157），而两名患者（1.1%）需要一个血液单位的紧急要求。此外，还有似乎没有理由采用不同的阈值触发器对电脑和电脑只有PABD +患者，作为他们的出发条件是相同的。