A third limitation has to do with t

A third limitation has to do with the absence of measures relevant to testing some of our assumptions. We chose body movements that had very clear meanings attached to them but did not include measures of those associations. Nodding is often associated with high validity meanings (agreement, truth, approval; Cian, 2017), whereas shaking tends to be associated with low validity (disagreement, negation, disapproval). If the meaning associated with these head movements was different than assumed, the effect of those bodily movements on subsequent performance could also change (Brinol, Petty, Santos, & Mello, 2018 ˜ ; Gasco´, Brinol, Santos, Petty, & Horcajo, 2018 ˜ ). In addition, we did not assess the association between head movements and perceived validity, as it was done in previous research (Brinol & Petty, 2003 ˜ ). Instead of measuring thought validity, we tested this assumption indirectly by examining the relationship between self-talk and performance across the head movement conditions and found the predicted pattern. Thus, we expected (hypothesis 3) and found a significantly larger correlation between self-statements and performance for nodding (vs. shaking).

結果 (繁體中文) 2:

心理健康與青少年研究所的探索精神衛生部收集兒童資訊和耀沃特諾克盧姆。總計 20，0002556年3月至6月，泰國各地民眾使用遊戲的安裝測試（遊戲成癮篩查測試 +GAST）顯示3月至6月泰國兒童和青少年遊戲安裝統計資料13.10。15.20%沒有問題，71.70%，並從兒童和青少年機構的研究。精神衛生部今天發現，2556名兒童，其中1800萬兒童中，有250萬兒童。在泰國，這是一個非常高的數位。

結果 (繁體中文) 3:

第三個限制與缺乏與測試我們的一些假設相關的措施有關。我們選擇的肢體動作有非常明確的含義，但不包括這些聯系的措施。點頭通常與有效性較高的含義（同意、真理、贊同；Cian，2017）相關，而搖晃往往與有效性較低的含義（不同意、否定、不贊同）相關。如果與這些頭部運動相關的含義不同於假設，那麼這些身體運動對隨後表現的影響也可能改變（Brinol，Petty，Santos，&Mello，2018；Gasco™，Brinol，Santos，Petty，&Horcajo，2018™）。此外，我們沒有像以前的研究那樣評估頭部運動與感知效度之間的關聯（Brinol&Petty，2003●）。我們沒有量測思維的有效性，而是通過檢查自言自語和整個頭部運動條件下的表現之間的關係來間接地檢驗這一假設，並找到預測的模式。囙此，我們期望（假設3），並發現自我陳述與點頭表現（與搖晃相比）之間的相關性顯著增大。