ConclusionsThe conventional methods

Conclusions

The conventional methods of design and evaluation of strengthened masonry walls with RC layers have resulted in massive retrofitting details because of the consideration of inaccurate failure modes and the use of improper design relations. To account for this problem, this study proposes a seismic evaluation method based on available experimental data and this study’s numerical analysis. In arriving at the proposed method, four failure modes are considered for strengthened masonry walls. The design relations, linear, and non- linear static analysis parameters according to FEMA reports for each failure mode are also given. The accuracy of the proposed relations and bilinear curves is verified by comparing the results with available experimental and performed analytical results. This study shows that the proposed method is able to accurately predict the failure mode and capacity of the strengthened walls. It should be noted that the need for conducting more extensive experimental research is crucial for better understanding the nonlinear behavior of strengthened masonry walls with RC layer, calibration of the recommendations, and improvement of the precision of the proposed method, especially in predicting the nonlinear deformation capacities.

結果 (中文) 1:

结论传统的设计方法和评价加强的砌体墙片与钢筋混凝土层由于会造成大规模改造细节不准确的失效模式的考虑和利用设计不当关系。考虑到这一问题，本研究提出了一种基于现有的实验数据和数值分析的抗震性能评价方法。在作出建议的方法，加强的砌体墙片考虑四种破坏模式。根据联邦应急管理局报告每个失效模式的线性静力分析参数与设计的关系，线性的也给出。结果与可用实验和执行分析结果的对比验证了拟议的关系和双线性曲线的准确性。这项研究显示拟议的方法能够准确地预测的失效模式和能力加强的墙壁。应指出的是，需要开展更广泛的实验研究，对于更好地理解加强的砌体墙片与钢筋混凝土层，建议，校准和提高精度的方法，尤其是在预测的非线性变形能力的非线性行为至关重要。

結果 (中文) 3:

结论

和加固砌体结构与钢筋混凝土层评价设计的传统方法已经导致了大规模的改造的细节，因为不准确的故障模式的思考和设计使用不当的关系。考虑到这个问题，本研究提出了一种基于实验数据和本研究的数值分析的抗震评估方法。在到达该方法，四个故障模式被认为是用于加固砌体墙。设计关系，线性，非线性静力分析参数根据每个失效模式给出了FEMA报告。所提出的关系和双线性曲线精度的结果与现有的实验和分析结果进行比较验证。这项研究表明，该方法能够准确地预测加固墙体的破坏模式和承载力。值得注意的是，进行更广泛的实验研究需要的是更好地了解加固砌体结构与钢筋混凝土层的非线性行为的关键，建议校准，提高了方法的精度，特别是在预测的非线性变形能力。