二是关于“成熟无害苹果”的。日本认为，成员方在选择、衡量和评估科学依据

二是关于“成熟无害苹果”的。日本认为，成员方在选择、衡量和评估科学依据时有自由裁量权，专家组应该尊重日本的方法，但是专家组在评估科学依据时完全采用专家的意见而未考虑日本的观点，专家组错误地适用了2.2条。上诉机构认为，条款中的“充分”一词暗示着“合理和客观的”意思。

結果 (英文) 1:

Mature harmless Apple. Japan believes that, when there are members of the party in the selection, measurement and evaluation of the scientific basis for discretionary right panel should respect the Japanese method, but the group of experts in the assessment of the scientific basis for completely expert advice without considering the Japanese point of view, the group error apply 2.2. The Appellate Body found that the terms "adequate" connotes "reasonable and objective" meaning.

結果 (英文) 2:

The two is about the "mature harmless apple".The Japanese think, members in the selection, measurement and assessment of the scientific basis with discretion, group of experts should respect Japanese method, but the expert group in the assessment of scientific evidence with expert opinion completely without considering the Japanese point of view, the expert group wrongly applied 2.2.The appellate body that, in terms of "full" implies "reasonable and objective.".

結果 (英文) 3:

B is on "mature Apple-friendly". Japan believes that members in selecting, measuring and assessing scientific basis with discretion, the expert group should be respect for Japan, but the group in assessing the scientific basis for use of expert advice, which is not considered Japan's views, the expert group was incorrectly applied article 2.2. Appellate body found that, in terms of "full" suggests the term "reasonable and objective" means.