In practice, however, the (in)congruity between aproduct and its associated product category schemamay lie between the extremes of a perfect match ormismatch. New products often claim both attributescongruent and attributes incongruent with a moregeneral product category schema. A recent exampleis the beverage Slice, which is positioned as a softdrink and has attributes associated with the soft drinkschema-such as carbonation, slightly sweet taste,and packaging in cans and plastic bottles. But Slicealso has an attribute not included in the soft drinkschema; it contains real fruit juice. The more moderateincongruity created by a partial match between aproduct and a category schema may lead to a differentevaluation process than will either a pure match ormismatch. Further, the cognitive activity stimulatedby various levels of congruity may have effects beyondthose demonstrated by Fiske (1982) and Sujan(1985). Mandler (1982) suggests that the very processof responding to (in)congruity may itself produceaffect that contributes to product evaluations.