A 2004 California case involved sce

A 2004 California case involved scenting a dog at the scene of a crime to a scent pad prepared by
wiping the hands of a suspect. The dog trailed from the scene of the crime to a location where other
testimony indicated the defendant had been picked up by a car. The appellate court determined that
the trailing evidence should have been excluded but found its admission to be harmless error.

結果 (中文) 1:

2004 年加州一起案件涉及窨一条狗在备香味垫到犯罪现场擦手的犯罪嫌疑人。狗从犯罪现场跟踪到一个位置，其他证词表明被告已被捡起被一辆车。上诉法院裁定，尾随的证据应被排除在外，但发现其入场是无害的错误。

結果 (中文) 3:

2004加利福尼亚案涉及窨狗在准备的气味垫一个犯罪现场一个嫌疑犯的手。狗在从犯罪现场的位置等证词表明被告被一辆汽车所用。上诉法院裁定尾随的证据应该被排除在外，但发现其承认是无害的错误。