In a Washington case from 2003, an

In a Washington case from 2003, an individual had refused to stop for an officer’s flashing light
and ran into the woods. The use of the dog was neither deadly nor excessive force under the circumstances.
In the 45- to 60-second period that the dog bit and held the suspect, the dog had torn
through the suspect’s biceps all the way to the bone. The court held that even though a police dog
can kill a suspect, the possibility is remote and deploying the dog “does not convert otherwise nondeadly
force into deadly force.”

結果 (中文) 1:

从 2003 年的华盛顿以防个人拒绝停止为官闪烁的亮光和跑进了树林。那条狗采用既不致命，也不过度武力的情况下。在 45 到 60 秒期间狗咬和拘留嫌疑犯，撕下了那条狗通过犯罪嫌疑人的二头肌一路到骨头。法院认为，即使一只警犬可以杀死一名嫌疑犯，可能性是远程部署狗"不转换否则 nondeadly逼进致命武力。

結果 (中文) 3:

在华盛顿的一个案例2003，一个人拒绝停止对军官的闪光
，跑进树林。狗的使用既不致命也不多的情况下，力。在45至60
二期，狗咬狗，拘留嫌疑犯，把嫌疑犯的二
通过路骨。法院认为，尽管警犬
可以杀死一个怀疑，可能是远程部署的狗”没有转换否则nondeadly
力为致命的力量。”