Une reponse positive s'impose si I'

Une reponse positive s'impose si I'investisseur a saisi Ie tribunal arbitral. La regie est bien etablie s'agissant des procedures d'arbitrage CIRDI, ainsi que I'a souligne la decision du 16
mai 1986 dans I'affaire AMCO c/lndonesie: "... I'Etat dont l'investisseur est Ie ressortissant ne peut exercer son droit de protection diplomatique tant que se deroule la procedure d'arbitrage GIRDI et meme au dela de cel/e-ci, aI'egard de l'Etat contractant qui se conforme a la sentence GIRDI ... ". L'absence dans l'Accord d'une disposition semblable a I'article 27 de la Convention de Washington de 1965 n'empeche pas I'application de ce principe par analogie.

結果 (英文) 1:

A positive response is needed if I' investor before the arbitral tribunal. The Régie is well established with regard to the ICSID, as well as arbitration procedures' stressed the decision of 16May 1986 in I' case AMCO c/Indonesia:... I' State where the investor is a national may not exercise its right of diplomatic protection as that place the GIRDI arbitration and even beyond cel / è, aI' respect of the Contracting State which conforms a sentencing GIRDI... ". The absence in the agreement of a similar provision was I' section 27 of the Washington Convention of 1965 prevents not I'application of this principle by analogy.

結果 (英文) 3:

a positive response is required if the investor before the arbitral tribunal. the enterprise is based on arbitration procedures), and the said decision 16in may 1986 the amco (c / indonesia ". the state of nationality is the investor can exercise its right of diplomatic protection as long as the procedure of arbitration is being done in the girdi and cel / e), with respect to the contracting state in which the sentence with girdi... " the absence in the agreement of a provision similar to article 27 of the convention in washington, d.c. 1965 does not interfere with the application of the principle of analogy.