2.4. Evaluation of the microbial population in doughs
At appropriate leavening intervals, 5–8 g of dough were diluted in
45–72 mL sterile peptone water (10 g/L Bacto-peptone in distilled
water, pH 6.8) and homogenized in a Stomacher 400 Circulator (Seward, Worthing, UK) for 5 min at 260 rpm. After decimal dilutions in
the same solution, suspensions were plated in appropriate media. L.
sanfranciscensis population was plated onto MRSm agar (MRSm broth
added of 15 g/L agar) while Z. mobilis onto DSM agar (DSM broth
added of 15 g/L agar). Plates were then incubated at 30 °C for 3 days
in anaerobic conditions. Total bacterial count (TBC) was determined
pour plating in Tryptic Soy Agar (TSA, Scharlab, Barcelona, Spain) after
incubation at 30 °C for 48–72 h. Yeasts and moulds were determined
pour plating in Yeast Glucose Chloramphenicol Agar (YGC-Scharlab)
and incubated at 25 °C for 3–5 days. Counts were reported as logarithms
of the number of colony forming units (Log CFU/g of dough), and means
and standard deviations were calculated (n = 3).
2.5. Analytical determinations
Sugars (maltose and glucose) consumption, as well as ethanol, lactic
and acetic acid produced during leavening were determined through an
HPLC system (L 7000, Merck Hitachi) equipped with RI and UV
(210 nm) detectors serially connected, using a (300–8 mm) SH1821
(Shodex, München, Germany) column, maintained at 50 °C and eluted
with 5 mM H2SO4 at 0.5 mL/min. Aliquots of 2–4 mL of homogenized
and appropriately diluted dough samples were centrifuged (Eppendorf
5804, 10,600 ×g, 10 min) and the obtained supernatants were filtered
through a 0.45 μm syringe filter (VWR International, USA) before
HPLC analysis. Date were referred to 1 g dough (mg/g dough).
Dough pH was monitored at different intervals on the integral undiluted dough sample (pH-meter Eutech Instruments pH 510).
2.6. Statistical analysis
Data were submitted to t-test and one-way analysis of variance
(ANOVA) performed with SPSS software, version 21.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). When the effect was significant (p b 0.05), differences between means were assessed by Tukey-b test of multiple comparisons.
2.4.生面团中的微生物种群的评价在适当的发酵时间间隔,5-8 克的面团被稀释45-72 毫升无菌蛋白胨水 (10 g/L 细菌蛋白胨在蒸馏水,ph 值 6.8) 和同质化抹胸 400 环行器 (Sew ard,值得,英国) 在 260 rpm 5 分钟。在十进制稀释后同一解决方案中,悬浮液被镀在适当的媒体。L.sanfranciscensis 人口被镀上 MRSm 琼脂 (MRSm 肉汤添加的 15 G-L 琼脂) 虽然 Z.单胞菌到电力需求侧管理 (DSM 肉汤琼脂添加的琼脂 15 g/L)。板然后孵育在 30 ° C 3 天在厌氧条件下。确定了细菌总数 (待定)后倒入镀在胰酪胨大豆琼脂 (TSA,Scharlab,西班牙巴塞罗那)确定了孵化在 30 ° C 的 48-72 h.酵母菌和霉菌倒入镀酵母葡萄糖氯霉素琼脂 (YGC-Scharlab)及孵化在 25 ° C 为 3-5 天。计数被报告为对数集落形成单位 (日志 CFU/g 的面团) 和手段的数目计算标准偏差和 (n = 3)。2.5.分析测定糖 (麦芽糖和葡萄糖) 消费,以及乙醇,乳酸通过确定在发酵过程中产生的醋酸、高效液相色谱系统 (L 7000,默克公司日立) 配备 RI 和 UV(210 nm) 探测器串联连接,使用 (300-8 毫米) SH1821(Shodex,慕尼黑,德国) 列,维持在 50 ° C,洗脱with 5 mM H2SO4 at 0.5 mL/min. Aliquots of 2–4 mL of homogenizedand appropriately diluted dough samples were centrifuged (Eppendorf5804, 10,600 ×g, 10 min) and the obtained supernatants were filteredthrough a 0.45 μm syringe filter (VWR International, USA) beforeHPLC analysis. Date were referred to 1 g dough (mg/g dough).Dough pH was monitored at different intervals on the integral undiluted dough sample (pH-meter Eutech Instruments pH 510).2.6. Statistical analysisData were submitted to t-test and one-way analysis of variance(ANOVA) performed with SPSS software, version 21.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). When the effect was significant (p b 0.05), differences between means were assessed by Tukey-b test of multiple comparisons.
正在翻譯中..
![](//zhcntimg.ilovetranslation.com/pic/loading_3.gif?v=b9814dd30c1d7c59_8619)