The second approach is called “Spre

The second approach is called “Spread Energy With Priority” (SEWP), and consists in spreading the energy to be still supplied to the user over the entire time period available before the user leaves the system. In this case, the charging rate is calculated as CR = ER(t)/TR(t). Simulations were performed to evaluate the impact of the MEWP and SEWP approaches for the six vehicles of Table 1. As shown by results in Tables 2 and 3, the two smart approaches lead to a significant increase in both the degrees of user satisfaction and the total profit of the utility with respect to the FR-FCFS strategy because of a better exploitation of the grid potentiality. Fig. 2 clearly evidences that the total allocated power by using MEWP and SEWP is almost equal to the maximum power available from the grid for
the greater part of the process. The comparison between data in Tables 2 and 3 shows that the MEWP and SEWP methods are almost equivalent when a unitary constant charging efficiency is assumed. In the next section, the impact of the charging efficiency will be analyzed.

結果 (中文) 1:

第二种方法称为"传播能量与优先"(SEWP)，由中传播的能量仍提供给用户在整个时间段内可用之前用户离开系统。在这种情况下，充电速度计算作为 CR = ER(t)/TR(t)。进行了模拟，以评估表 1 六辆车梯和 SEWP 方法的影响。由结果在表 2 和表 3 所示，这两种智能方法由于网格潜力更好地利用来导致用户的满意程度和对 FR FCFS 策略实用的总利润大幅增加。图 2 显然总通过使用梯和 SEWP 分配权力的证据是从为网格几乎等于可用的最大力量更大过程的一部分。数据在表 2 和 3 之间的比较表明，阶梯和 SEWP 方法几乎等同时假定酉恒压充电效率。在下一节中，将分析了充电效率的影响。

結果 (中文) 3:

第二种方法称之为“传播能量优先”（sewp），包括传播的能量仍然是提供给用户在整个时间段可用的用户离开系统前。在这种情况下，收费率计算为CR =二（T）/ TR（T）。模拟进行评估的六辆表1的初步分析sewp途径的影响。如表2和表3的结果，两个聪明的方法导致的程度的用户满意度和相对于fr-fcfs战略效用的总利润明显增加，因为一个更好的利用网格的潜力。图2明确的证据表明总功率分配通过初步分析sewp几乎等于从电网
过程的更大一部分功率最大。比较表2和表3中的数据显示，初步分析sewp方法相当当酉恒压充电效率假定。在下一节，对充电效率的影响进行了分析。