還有人，我是在告訴你……我不知道我是否曾經想讓電影中的某個人像約翰·威

還有人，我是在告訴你……我不知道我是否曾經想讓電影中的某個人像約翰·威克那樣想要把這些朋克殺死。這是對一階電影的無恥操作，但電影知道可以分裝。在均衡器中，操縱從未停止；一旦丹澤爾·華盛頓（Denzel Washington）的角色走了，反派的殘酷性就會成倍增加。約翰·威克（John Wick）更為乾淨：這給我們提供了發生流血事件的內在原因，但隨後卻使它變得酷起來。它的野心是審美，而不是道德。

結果 (英文) 1:

There are people, I'm telling you ...... I do not know if the movie is a portrait of John Wick did want to kill these punk ever want. This is a shameless operation of the order of the film, but the film can know repackaging. In the equalizer, manipulation never stopped; the role once Denzel Washington (Denzel Washington) is gone, the cruelty of the villain will be doubled. John Wick (John Wick) much cleaner: it provides us with the underlying causes of the bloodshed, but then it becomes cool together. Its ambition is aesthetic, not moral.

結果 (英文) 2:

There's someone else, I'm telling you... I don't know if I ever wanted someone in the movie to want to kill these punks like John Wick. It's a shameless operation on first-order movies, but the movies know they can be packed. In the equaliser, the manipulation never stops; once Denzel Washington's role is gone, the villain's cruelty becomes multiplied. John Wick was cleaner: it gave us the underlying reason for the bloodshed, but then it cooled it down. Its ambition is aesthetics, not morality.

結果 (英文) 3:

Someone else, I'm telling you I don't know if I ever wanted someone in the movie to kill these punks like John wick. This is a shameless operation of the first-order film, but the film knows that it can be repackaged. In the equalizer, manipulation never stops; once the role of Denzel Washington is gone, the cruelty of the villain will multiply. John wick is cleaner: it gives us the inner cause of the bloodshed, but then it makes it cool. Its ambition is aesthetic, not moral.