The children should be the ones tha

The children should be the ones that get the punishment for their behaviour. If a teacher cannot control her students, the STUDENTS should be the one who get in trouble. I personally am a high school student, and even I believe that! What, if for example, you were a teacher and you could not control your students? How would you feel if you were fired? Would you happily pack up your bags and walk away? Think about it. It would be the students faults, and therefore they should get the punishment. And if you can't believe a year 7 student who goes to high school HERSELF, then you should learn to think about going into the teachers shoes yourself. As for those of you who think that that is their job, clearly you don't under stand what a teacher does. They are meant to teach, not to be infuriated or depressed by students. Teaching means making them learn skills, not making them calm down. When a student is bad or obnoxious, the parents should be dealing with their behaviour at home rather than the teachers telling them at school. I leave you with one final statement- 'WHY DONT YOU TRY STEPPING IN THEIR SHOES?'.

結果 (繁體中文) 1:

孩子們應該是得到他們的行為懲罰的人。如果老師無法控制她的學生，學生應該是一個誰遇到麻煩。我個人是一名高中學生，甚至我相信！什麼，例如如果你是老師，你無法控制你的學生？你會感覺如何，如果你被解僱？你會高高興興地收拾行李，離開？想想吧。這將是學生的錯誤，因此，他們應該得到的懲罰。如果你不能相信一年7學生誰去高中的自己，那麼你就應該學會思考進入老師的鞋自己。至於你們誰認為這是他們的工作，顯然你不這樣做下架老師做什麼。他們是為了教，不被激怒或由學生鬱悶。教學手段使他們學習技能，而不是讓他們冷靜下來。當一個學生是壞的或厭惡，家長應該與他們的行為在家裡處理，而不是學校老師告訴他們。我留給你一個最後的陳述書'你為什麼不嘗試在他們的鞋子干擾？“。

結果 (繁體中文) 2:

PVC 盒比紙盒貴

結果 (繁體中文) 3:

孩子們應該為他們的行為受到懲罰。如果一個老師不能控制她的學生，學生應該是那個陷入困境的人。我個人是一個高中生，甚至我都相信！例如，如果你是一個老師，你不能控制你的學生？如果你被解雇了你會怎麼想？你能高興地收拾行李走開嗎？想想看。這將是學生的錯誤，囙此他們應該得到懲罰。如果你不能相信一個自己上高中的七年級學生，那麼你就應該學會自己去考慮當老師。至於你們中那些認為這是他們的工作的人，顯然你們不理解老師的所作所為。他們的本意是教書，而不是被學生激怒或沮喪。教學意味著讓他們學習技能，而不是讓他們冷靜下來。當學生不好或令人討厭時，家長應該在家裡處理他們的行為，而不是在學校老師告訴他們。我給你最後一句話——“你為什麼不試著站在他們的立場上？”.