False. From the firm’s point of vie

False. From the firm’s point of view, the wage paid to the worker is an explicit cost whether she was previously unemployed or not. The firm’s opportunity cost is equal to the wage, because if it did not hire this worker, it would have had to hire someone else at the same wage. The opportunity cost from the worker’s point of view is the value of her time, which is unlikely to be zero. By taking this job, she cannot work at another job or take care of a child or elderly person at home.If her best alternative is working at another job, she gives up the wage she would have earned.If her best alternative is unpaid, such as taking care of a loved one, she will now have to pay someone else to do that job, and the amount she has to pay is her opportunity cost.

結果 (繁體中文) 1:

假。但從公司的角度來看，支付給工人工資是顯性成本，她是否是以前失業或沒有。該公司的機會成本等於工資，因為如果沒有僱傭這名工人，將不得不在同一工資別的僱人。但從工人的點的機會成本是她的時間，這是不太可能的值為零。通過採取這一工作，她不能在其他作業工作或照顧兒童或老人的家中。
如果她的最好的選擇是在另一個崗位上工作，她放棄了，她會得到的工資。
如果她的最好的辦法是無償，如服用的親人照顧，她現在將不得不支付別人做的工作，她有支付的金額是她的機會成本。

結果 (繁體中文) 2:

For me, studying the previous academic English. It's really good.

結果 (繁體中文) 3:

假的。從公司的角度來看，無論工人以前是否失業，支付給她的薪水都是一個明確的成本。公司的機會成本等於薪水，因為如果它不雇用這個工人，它就不得不以同樣的薪水雇用其他人。從工人的角度來看，機會成本是她的時間價值，不可能是零。接受這份工作，她就不能再做別的工作，也不能在家照顧小孩或老人。
如果她最好的選擇是另一份工作，她就會放弃她本該掙的薪水。
如果她最好的選擇是無償的，比如照顧一個心愛的人，她現在就得付錢給別人去做這項工作，而她必須支付的金額就是她的機會成本。