交叉比較實驗設計一些專業人士認為拒絕治療對照組是不道德的。此外，對照組

交叉比較實驗設計一些專業人士認為拒絕治療對照組是不道德的。此外，對照組中的一些人可能無法接受拒絕治療，這可能導致在他們中退出實驗和/或去其他地方接受治療。前者新增“實驗死亡率”，後者可能會污染研究。交叉比較實驗設計使得在沒有拒絕治療任何群體，儘管這種設計有自己的問題。

結果 (英文) 1:

Cross comparison of experimental design
some professionals believe that to refuse treatment in the control group was unethical.
In addition, the control group, some of whom may not refuse to accept treatment, which could lead to their exit in experimental and / or go elsewhere for treatment. The former
new "experimental mortality", which may contaminate the study.
Cross comparison of experimental design such that no refuse treatment to any group, although this design has its own problems.

結果 (英文) 2:

Cross-comparison experimental design
Some professionals consider it unethical to refuse treatment in the control group.
In addition, some people in the control group may not be able to accept the denial of treatment, which may lead to withdrawal from the experiment and/or treatment elsewhere among them. Former
Added "experimental mortality", which may contaminate research.
Cross-comparison experimental designs make it possible for any group not to refuse treatment, although this design has its own problems.

結果 (英文) 3:

Design of cross comparison experiment
Some professionals consider it unethical to refuse to treat the control group.
In addition, some people in the control group may not be able to receive treatment refusal, which may lead to withdrawal from the experiment and / or other places for treatment among them. the former
Add "experimental mortality," which may contaminate research.
The design of cross comparison experiment makes it possible to treat any group without rejection, although this design has its own problems.