In order to assess cross-group diff

In order to assess cross-group differences, we conducted a one-way analysis
of variance (ANOVA) to test for differences in group means. Table 4 provides data
for the cluster means, standard errors (SE), the F test, and Scheffe comparisons.
Cluster 1 has a relatively high value for agile supply chain characteristics and
lower value of lean supply chain characteristics, thus we can name it the Agile
strategy group. Cluster 2 has the highest values of both lean and agile supply
chain characteristics among all the groups. Therefore, we name it as Lean/Agile
group. This name is chosen to represent the group that combines lean and agile
characteristics, because they appear to emphasize both lean and agile strategies.
As we will examine later, this is not to say that they are achieving both strategies,
rather they are trying to achieve both. Cluster 3 has the lowest values for both lean
and agile supply chain characteristics. Due to the apparent lack of a singular focus,
we name this group the Traditional group. Finally, Cluster 4 has a very high value
for lean supply chain characteristics but the lowest value for agile supply chain
characteristics. Thus, this relatively focused group is named as pure Lean group.
Our results provide support for Proposition 1 and its related subhypotheses.

結果 (繁體中文) 2:

為了評估跨組的差異，我們進行了單向分析
方差分析（ANOVA）來測試不同的組裝置。表4提供的數據
為集群方式，標準誤差（SE），F檢驗，薛費和比較。
第1組具有敏捷供應鏈的特點和較高價值
的精益供應鏈的特性值較低，因此，我們可以將其命名的敏捷
組策略。第2組有兩個精益和敏捷的供應最高值
鏈中的所有群體之間的特點。因此，我們將其命名為精益/敏捷
組。這個名字是選擇代表，結合精益和敏捷組
特性，因為它們似乎既強調精益和敏捷的策略。
我們以後會研究，這是不是說，他們正在實現兩種策略，
而他們正在努力實現兩者。第3組有兩個精幹的最低值
和敏捷供應鏈的特點。由於明顯缺乏一個奇異的焦點，
我們命名這個組傳統組。最後，第4組具有極高價值
的精益供應鏈的特點，但對於敏捷供應鏈的最低值
的特點。因此，這種相對集中的組被命名為純瘦肉組。
我們的研究結果提供了命題1及其相關subhypotheses支持。