通過使用SuperDecisions®通過將每個標準相對於其餘標准進行

通過使用SuperDecisions®通過將每個標準相對於其餘標准進行成對比較來確定評估標準的等級。同樣，針對選定的標準對不同的Wte技術進行了成對比較。通過對四個備選方案的技術審查收集的相關數據有助於在成對比較中分配不同的比例。得分最高的技術將對所選替代方案的評估產生最大影響。此後，通過為所考慮的評估標準的每個備選方案分配分數，來對每個評估標准進行一組選定備選方案的成對比較。具有最高分數的替代方法被認為相對於該標準表現出更好的性能。此後，將評估標準權重和替代分數合併在一起，以確定每個替代的總體分數以及隨後的排名。全球得分最高的技術是毛里求斯MSW能源回收的優先技術，被認為是決策過程的最佳選擇（Saaty，1980）。

結果 (英文) 1:

By using standard SuperDecisions® by each pair of phase comparison to other criteria to determine the level of the evaluation criteria. Similarly, for the selected criteria Wte different techniques were compared in pairs. Data collected by the technical review of four options help distribute different proportions in the pairwise comparisons. Assessment of the highest scores of the selected alternative technology will have the greatest impact. Thereafter, by assigning a score of each alternative evaluation criteria considered to be a pair of selected options evaluation criteria for each group. Alternative with the highest score are considered with respect to the standard exhibit better performance. Thereafter, the evaluation criteria and weighting alternative scores are combined to determine the overall score for each alternative and the subsequent rankings. The world's highest technical score is the preferred technique Mauritius MSW energy recovery, is considered to be the best choice (Saaty, 1980) decision-making process.

結果 (英文) 2:

By using SuperDecisions® the level of the evaluation criteria is determined by comparing each standard in pairs relative to the rest. Similarly, different Wte techniques are compared in pairs for selected criteria. The relevant data collected through a technical review of the four options helps to allocate different proportions in pairs of comparisons. The technology with the highest score will have the greatest impact on the evaluation of the selected alternative. Thereafter, a pair of selected alternatives is compared to each evaluation criterion by assigning scores to each alternative considered. Alternatives with the highest score are considered to perform better than this standard. After that, the evaluation standard weights and replacement scores are combined to determine the overall score for each alternative and subsequent rankings. The highest-scoring technology in the world is the priority technology for MSW energy recovery in Mauritius and is considered the best choice for decision-making processes (Saaty, 1980).

結果 (英文) 3:

The level of evaluation criteria is determined by using superdecisions ® to compare each criterion in pairs with the rest. In the same way, different WTE technologies are compared in pairs according to the selected standards. Data collected through technical reviews of the four alternatives can help to allocate different proportions in paired comparisons. The technology with the highest score will have the greatest impact on the evaluation of the selected alternatives. Thereafter, a pair comparison of a set of selected alternatives for each evaluation criteria is performed by assigning scores to each alternative for the evaluation criteria considered. An alternative method with the highest score is considered to perform better than the standard. Thereafter, the evaluation criteria weights and alternative scores are combined to determine the overall score for each alternative and subsequent ranking. The technology with the highest score in the world is the priority technology of MSW energy recovery in Mauritius, which is considered to be the best choice for the decision-making process (Saaty, 1980).