内 容 提 要鉴定证据的举证责任在司法实践中往往被法官和当事人忽略，但

内 容 提 要

鉴定证据的举证责任在司法实践中往往被法官和当事人忽略，但实际上，这是一个很重要的问题。本文通过分析举证责任的概念以及我国现行的举证责任制度，来论述鉴定证据的举证责任该如何分配的问题。本文的创新之处在于从鉴定程序的启动着手讨论鉴定证据的举证责任。通过举例论述鉴定证据举证责任与司法鉴定程序启动之间的关系，来论述鉴定证据举证责任该如何分配。鉴定证据举证责任分配应当遵循“谁主张，谁举证”原则，同时严格控制举证责任倒置原则的适用。鉴定证据的举证不同于其他证据的举证，严格控制举证责任倒置原则的适用有利于当事人积极主动并及时承担鉴定证据的举证责任；同时，对于个别类型的案件适用举证责任倒置，平衡各方利益，达到查明案件事实和公平正义的目的。

关键词
举证责任；鉴定证据；举证责任倒置

結果 (中文) 3:

Abstract the burden of proof to

evidence in judicial practice, judges and the parties often ignored, but in fact, this is a very important problem. In this paper, through the analysis of the concept of burden of proof and the current system of burden of proof, the burden of proof to discuss the evidence the problem of how to allocate. The innovation of this paper is to start from the identification procedure on burden of proof of identification. The relationship between how evidence of burden of proof and the judicial expertise procedure to start, to discuss how to distribute the burden of proof of identification evidence. Identification of the allocation of the burden of proof should follow the "who advocate,Who bears the burden of proof "principle, application and strict control of the principle of the burden of proof. Identification of proof of evidence is different from other proof of evidence, is suitable the strict control principle of the burden of proof burden of proof is conducive to the parties to actively and promptly take evidence; at the same time, the case for the inversion of burden of proof in individual type, balance the interests of all parties, to find the truth of the case and the fairness and justice of purpose. Keywords


the burden of proof; evidence; burden of proof