迄今為止，對不同資料產生的煙霧的量測主要是在靜態箱中進行的，其中最著名

迄今為止，對不同資料產生的煙霧的量測主要是在靜態箱中進行的，其中最著名的是煙霧密度箱。這種測試方法有幾個缺點：產生煙霧的速度難以精確跟踪，樣品的垂直方向不包括熱塑性塑膠的相關測試，沒有質量損失的量測，輻照度水准的範圍有限。這些缺點中的一些已經在以後的修改中被克服，但是靜態的，累積的測試方法的主要問題仍然存在。囙此，人們提出了一個動態的、流動的系統，並期望它對全面和真實的火灾有更好的預測能力。這種小型測試儀器現在可以在錐形量熱計中使用。它最初是為量測熱釋放速率而開發的，但也能確定煙霧釋放量、點火時間等。然而，一些研究人員指出了量測成熟或老化煙霧的重要性，而在流通系統中可能不是這樣。在小範圍內，靜態和動態條件之間的比較有限，表明動態條件下產生的煙霧較少。錐形量熱計中的煙霧量測是通過雷射束進行的，與大多數早期的量測不同。該雷射器具有設計簡單、光束准直度高、理論關聯性簡化等優點。然而，雷射系統可能會在訊號穩定性和能見度方面產生一些問題，這對真實火灾情况下的逃生非常重要。在錐形量熱計的應用中，第二控制光度計提高了訊號的穩定性。

結果 (英文) 1:

To date, the measurement of different data generated smoke is mainly carried out in the static case in which the most famous is the density of the smoke box. This test method has several drawbacks: difficult to accurately smoke speed tracking, the vertical direction of the sample and do not include testing a thermoplastic plastic, there is no mass loss measurement, irradiance level of limited range. Some of these disadvantages have been overcome in the future modification, but still, the main problem of the accumulation of test methods still exist.
Yin this, it presents a dynamic, fluid systems, and expects its full and real fires have better predictive power. This small test instrument can now be used in the cone calorimeter. It was originally measured heat release rate and development, but also the smoke emission is determined, the ignition timing and the like. However, some researchers have pointed out the importance of measuring aging mature or smoke, and in the circulation system may not be the case. In a small area, between the static and dynamic conditions of relatively limited, show less fumes under dynamic conditions.
Smoke cone calorimeter measurement is carried out by laser beam, with most of the early measurement differ. The laser has a simple design, a high degree of quasi-collimated beam, the advantages of simplified theoretical relevance. However, the laser system may have some problems in terms of signal stability and visibility, which escape to a real fire situation is very important. Application of the cone calorimeter, the second control signal to improve the stability of the photometer.

結果 (英文) 2:

To date, the measurement of smoke generated by different data has been mainly carried out in static boxes, the most famous of which is the smoke density box. This test method has several disadvantages: the speed of smoke generation is difficult to accurately track, the vertical direction of the sample does not include thermoplastic-related tests, there is no measurement of mass loss, the range of irradiance levels is limited. Some of these shortcomings have been overcome in subsequent modifications, but the main problems with static, cumulative testing methods remain.
In this way, a dynamic, mobile system has been proposed and it is expected to be better predicted for comprehensive and real fires. This small test instrument can now be used in a tapered gauge. It was originally developed to measure the rate of thermal release, but it can also determine the amount of smoke released, ignition time, and so on. However, some researchers point to the importance of measuring mature or aging smog, which may not be the case in circulation systems. In a small range, the relative limitation between static and dynamic conditions indicates that less smoke is produced under dynamic conditions.
The smoke measurement in the tapered gauge is measured by a laser beam, unlike most earlier measurements. The laser has the advantages of simple design, high beam collimation and simplified theoretical relevance. However, laser systems can cause problems with signal stability and visibility, which is important for escape in real-world fire situations. In the application of the cone gauge, the second control brightness meter improves the stability of the signal.

結果 (英文) 3:

So far, the measurement of smoke generated by different data is mainly carried out in static box, the most famous one is smoke density box. This method has several disadvantages: the speed of smoke generation is difficult to track accurately, the vertical direction of the sample does not include the related test of thermoplastic, there is no measurement of mass loss, and the range of irradiance level is limited. Some of these shortcomings have been overcome in later modifications, but the main problems of static and cumulative test methods still exist.
Therefore, people put forward a dynamic and flowing system, and expect it to have better prediction ability for comprehensive and real fire. This small test instrument can now be used in a cone calorimeter. It was originally developed to measure the heat release rate, but it can also determine the smoke release and ignition time. However, some researchers have pointed out the importance of measuring mature or aged smoke, which may not be the case in circulation systems. In a small range, the comparison between static and dynamic conditions is limited, indicating that less smoke is produced in dynamic conditions.
The measurement of smoke in cone calorimeter is carried out by laser beam, which is different from most early measurements. The laser has the advantages of simple design, high beam collimation and simplified theoretical correlation. However, the laser system may have some problems in signal stability and visibility, which is very important for escape in real fire situations. In the application of cone calorimeter, the second control photometer improves the signal stability.