In considering any discontinuous innovation, willingness to pay for the innovation is an important question. Participants were therefore asked how much they thought would be a fair price for each of the two airship service options, why, and whether they would purchase each option for that price and why. The concepts of fair price and willingness to pay address Phase 4 of the methodology in that they measure the pricing and demand for scenic airship services. The ‘why’ component of these addresses Phase 5 in that this qualitative information explains the motives behind the pricing and demand for each option. This provides an understanding as to how different trade-offs affect pricing and willingness to pay. Further, based on the survey, bungy jumping and skydiving were the two most popular adventure activities proposed. Accordingly, prices for both bungy jumping and skydiving were taken from the key providers of those adventure services in Queenstown and used to devise questions. Participants were asked, “Would you pay NZ$350 extra to skydive from 12,000 feet at the end of either option?” and “Would you pay NZ$200 extra to bungy jump from the airship as part of either option?” as ‘Yes’ or ‘No’ questions. It was assumed that if those providers have already charged similar prices, then the above prices are theoretically reasonable. Once again, this provided useful information relating to the ability to add ancillary services to service options. This has the potential to ameliorate risk associated with capital expenditure due to the possibility of additional income sources. The market evaluation and qualitative explanation phases were piloted twice to ensure ease of completion for participants who spoke English as a second language.