In post-test, rectal temperature wa

In post-test, rectal temperature was at the normal range in 22 (62.9%) and 17 (48.6%) cases in the intervention and control groups, respectively. Chi-square revealed that no significant difference was found between the groups regarding rectal temperature (P=0.23). While WBC count was within the normal range in 17 (48.6%) and 13 (37.1%) patients of the intervention and control groups, respectively, no statistically significant difference was observed between the groups according to the results of Chi-square (P=0.33).Furthermore, 20 (57.1%) and 17 (48.6%) patients had non-purulent endotracheal discharge in intervention and control groups, respectively, which indicated no significant difference in this regard (P=0.47). Pulmonary infiltration was not observed in 25 (71.4%) and 20 (57.1%) participants in intervention and control groups, respectively. According to the results of Chi-square test, no significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of observation of pulmonary infiltration in chest radiography (P=0.21) (Table 2). In total, 10 (28.6%) cases of intervention and 15 (42.9%) samples of control groups were diagnosed with VAP (based on clinical criteria of VAP); however, no significant difference was observed between the groups in this regard (Figure 2).

結果 (繁體中文) 1:

In post-test, rectal temperature was at the normal range in 22 (62.9%) and 17 (48.6%) cases in the intervention and control groups, respectively. Chi-square revealed that no significant difference was found between the groups regarding rectal temperature (P=0.23). While WBC count was within the normal range in 17 (48.6%) and 13 (37.1%) patients of the intervention and control groups, respectively, no statistically significant difference was observed between the groups according to the results of Chi-square (P=0.33).

此外，20（57.1％）和17（48.6％）患者在干預組和對照組中的非化膿性氣管排出，這表明在這方面（P = 0.47）無顯著差異。肺部浸潤不是在25（71.4％）和20（57.1％）的參與者分別觀察到在干預組和對照組。根據卡方檢驗的結果，沒有顯著差異兩組間中的在胸部X光（P = 0.21）（表2）肺部浸潤的觀察方面找到。總體上，干預10（28.6％）例和對照組的15（42.9％）的樣品被診斷為VAP（基於VAP的臨床標準）; 然而，在這方面（圖2）組與組之間沒有觀察到顯著差異。

結果 (繁體中文) 2:

在測試後，直腸溫度在22（62.9%）的正常範圍內和 17 （48.6%）分別發生在干預和控制組中。Chi-方顯示，在直腸溫度（P=0.23）方面，各組之間沒有顯著差異。雖然 WBC 計數在 17 中在正常範圍內（48.6%）和 13 （37.1%）分別根據Chi-方（P=0.33）的結果，在各組之間分別觀察到各組之間的統計學顯著性差異。

此外，20 （57.1%）和 17 （48.6%）患者在干預和對照組分別有非化膿內切分泌物，表明在這方面沒有顯著差異（P=0.47）。肺滲透未觀察到25 （71.4%）20 （57.1%）干預和對照組的參與者。根據Chi-方試驗的結果，兩組在胸部放射成像肺滲透觀察方面沒有顯著差異（P=0.21）（表2）。共 10 （28.6%）干預病例和15例（42.9%）對照組樣本被診斷為VAP（基於VAP的臨床標準）;然而，在這方面，各組之間沒有顯著差異（圖2）。

結果 (繁體中文) 3:

干預組22例（62.9%）直腸溫度在正常範圍，對照組17例（48.6%）直腸溫度在正常範圍。卡方檢驗顯示兩組間直腸溫度無顯著性差异（P=0.23）。干預組17例（48.6%）和對照組13例（37.1%）白細胞計數均在正常範圍內，卡方檢驗結果兩組間差异無統計學意義（P=0.33）。
此外，干預組和對照組分別有20例（57.1%）和17例（48.6%）出現非化膿性氣管內引流，兩者無顯著性差异（P=0.47）。干預組25例（71.4%）和對照組20例（57.1%）無肺浸潤。根據卡方檢驗結果，兩組在胸片肺浸潤觀察方面無顯著性差异（P=0.21）（錶2）。共有10例（28.6%）干預組和15例（42.9%）對照組的樣本被診斷為VAP（基於VAP的臨床標準）；但兩組之間在這方面沒有顯著差异（圖2）。