Upon the trial defendants called, a

Upon the trial defendants called, as an expert witness, a professor of mechanical and aerospace engineering, who had also been previously employed as a consulting engineer in the field of accident analysis and reconstruction. He testified to an extensive background in the use of seat belts in both the aircraft and automotive industries. Over plaintiff's objection, the expert was permitted to give his opinion that "The seat belt is an extremely effective device in either preventing or alleviating injury." More specifically, he stated that the seat belt is the most effective improvement that has been made in the automobile in the last 20 years. After viewing photographs of the vehicles and the accident scene, the expert opined that had the plaintiff been wearing a seat belt, she would not have been ejected from her automobile; and that had she not been ejected, she probably would not have been seriously injured. When asked on cross-examination if the fact that plaintiff was ejected from her automobile might have saved her life, the engineer stated that "the worst thing that could have happened to her [was] being ejected from the vehicle.

結果 (繁體中文) 1:

在庭審被告叫，作為專家證人，機械和航空航天工程學教授，誰也以前受僱為事故分析和重建領域的顧問工程師。他證明了在飛機和汽車行業都使用安全帶的廣泛的背景。在原告的反對，專家被允許給他的意見是“安全帶是在任何預防或減輕傷害一個非常有效的設備。” 更具體地講，他說，安全帶是已經在汽車已經取得近20年來最有效的改進。查看車輛的照片和事故現場後，專家認為，曾是原告系了安全帶，她就不會從她的汽車排出; 並且，如果她沒有被彈出，她很可能不會受到嚴重傷害。當盤問問，如果原告是從她的汽車排出的事實也許已經保存了她的生活，工程師指出，“這可能發生在她的最糟糕的事情[是]被從車輛排出。

結果 (繁體中文) 2:

審判後，被告作為專家證人傳喚了一位機械和航空航太工程教授，他以前還被聘為事故分析和重建領域的諮詢工程師。他證明了在飛機和汽車行業使用安全帶的廣泛背景。在原告的反對下，專家被允許給出他的觀點："安全帶是預防或減輕傷害的極其有效的裝置。在過去的20年裡在汽車裡製造。在查看了車輛和事故現場的照片後，專家認為，如果原告系安全帶，她就不會被從汽車中彈出;如果她沒有被逐出，她可能不會受重傷。當被問到原告被從汽車中彈出的事實是否救了她一命時，這位工程師說，"她可能發生的最糟糕的事情就是被逐出汽車。

結果 (繁體中文) 3:

審判後，被告以專家證人的身份傳喚了一比特機械和航空航太工程教授，他以前也曾在事故分析和重建領域擔任顧問工程師。他證明了在飛機和汽車工業中使用安全帶的廣泛背景。在原告的反對下，專家被允許發表他的意見，“安全帶是預防或減輕傷害的一個非常有效的裝置。”更具體地說，他說，安全帶是過去20年來汽車上最有效的改進。專家在查看了車輛照片和事故現場後認為，如果原告系上安全帶，她就不會被彈出汽車；如果她沒有被彈出，她很可能不會受重傷。在盤問原告被逐出汽車的事實是否可能救了她的命時，工程師說“她可能遇到的最糟糕的事情是被逐出汽車。