Furthermore, the SMEs, particularly

Furthermore, the SMEs, particularly in Kauman, Pekalongan, also challenge the implementation of Batikmark ceritifcation. According to their opinions, the implementation of Batikmark creates another burden for the SMEs, either in regards to the costs, or the administrative bureaucray. In their perspectives, the obligation to use labels as indication of the product’s type should be imposed to the traders or SMEs who produce and sell batik printing, including the imported ones, so that all batik printing products can be recognized by the consumers in the market. Regardless such positive or negative attitude towards the certification, there are also SMEs who can get benefits from the use of Batikmark certification, or the SNI, especially when they export the products abroad, or simply by the fact that there are segments of consumers who prefer to buy such certified products. To this date, compared with the total numbers of batik SMEs in Indonesia, only small numbers have registered for Batikmark certification, even though the Ministry of Industry has provided financial subsidy for the administration of Batikmark. This probably because of the requirement of SNI’s standards, which not all SMEs can fulfill, and that they need to apply for trademark registration to DGIPR first, while in fact many of them have not applied for trademark’s registrations

結果 (繁體中文) 1:

此外，中小型企業，特別是在 Kauman，Pekalongan，還挑戰 Batikmark ceritifcation 執行。根據他們的意見，Batikmark 執行為中小型企業，無論是在問候的成本或行政 bureaucray 創建了另一個負擔。他們的觀點，應為各貿易商或因生產和銷售蠟染印花，包括導入，以便所有蠟染印花產品能得到市場消費者的都認可，而中小企業強加義務使用標籤作為產品類型的徵兆。無論如此積極或消極的態度看待了認證，也有中小型企業，能從使用的 Batikmark 認證，獲得益處或 SNI，尤其是當他們出口產品在國外，或只是由事實有喜歡不喜歡的消費者細分購買此類認證的產品。到目前為止，相比，中小企業在印尼，蠟染總人數只有少數人登記 Batikmark 認證，即使產業部政務 Batikmark 提供了財政補貼。這可能是因為 SNI 的標準，這並不是所有的中小企業可以滿足，和他們需要申請商標注冊到 DGIPR 第一次，而事實上很多人沒有申請商標的 registrations