Fractal generating model are just merely pattern of discrete points drawn on screen pixels. The human capabilities to infer and detect the edge of from variety of object (Yuille, et al, 2004) still hold an important role to perceive the shape from these generative patterns. However, the limitations that come from the batik drawing tools, i.e. pencil and “canthing” make the hand‐made motifs is less detail relative to the printed ones. The pattern and characteristic of each human‐made batik design (see appendix) that try to mimicking the computational fractal pattern could be influent by several factors, such as: (1). the individually inference process of motif pattern by batik designer, which could be depend on the cognitive factor, his experience, and cultural background. (2). the creativity of each batik designer to decide the usage of the generative motifs, be it as klowongan, isen‐isen, or harmonization ornamentation, in his batik design (cf. Situngkir, 2008). The latter is highly related to the classifications and standard batik be it the mbatik conventions in keraton or the highly external influence of coastal cities (Sondari & Yusmawati, 2000). Frequently, as we can see in the appendix, these factors have emerged a unique and fascinating batik design.