有些人認為群體對個人的影響具有破壞性，因為群體的行為往往缺乏理智，又盲

有些人認為群體對個人的影響具有破壞性，因為群體的行為往往缺乏理智，又盲目激進。但從另一角度言，在日常生活中有許多事情的處理與決定，往往是採多人協議的方法，借重群體的組織與力量來推進，如各種人民團體的設立，其目的之一即為此。社會心理學者研究結論，認為群體討論會改進其成員原先的意見和看法。如果大部分的人原先的看法偏向甲案，那麼經過群體討論之後，偏於甲案的程度會增多；如果原先的一般見解認為乙案不適合，經過討論之後，認為乙案不適合的看法會更強烈，此之謂群體極化。 群體的決定趨向於極化，視群體中多數人在未加入群體以前所持的意見而決定。這也就是說，如果多數人原先就偏於冒險性，那麼群體的決定將更具冒險性；如果多數人原先的意見比較保守，那麼群體的決定將更趨於保守。群體極化的產生，有些學者認為透過互相辯論，群體中的成員可以獲得自己原先沒有或是沒有想到的意見與說詞，這些新的資料具有說服力，可以使一個人改變原先的決定。社會比較理論的解釋則強調一般人都具有評鑑自己的天性，而個人自我評鑑又往往以相類似的其他人的行為作比較的標準。群體討論的過程為個人提供一個相互比較的機會，加上一般人對與自己看法相類似而又較為極化的大都有喜愛與欽慕的反應，所以群體的決定易趨於極化。

結果 (英文) 1:

Some people think that groups of individuals affected with damaging, because the group is often irrational, blind activist. But from another angle, in everyday life has a lot of decisions, is often the method of mining agreements, drawing on community organization and to promote, as various civic organizations established, one of its aims. Social psychologists study conclusions, that group improved its previous comments and views of members of the seminar. If most people had opinions bias case, after a group discussion, increase in the degree of bias in a case; if the general opinion that the second option is not suitable for, after some discussion, considered that the case is not suitable for strong, this is called Group polarization. Group decision tends to be polarized, as most people did not join in the Group decided the views of groups before. That is to say, if most people initially on the adventurous side, the Group decided to be more adventurous; if the majority views of the original conservative groups decided to tend to be more conservative. Group polarization, some scholars believe that, through each debate, original members of the group can own no or no views and rhetoric, convincing these new data, may cause a person to change their decision. Social comparison theory explains the emphasis generally has the evaluation of one's own nature, and personal evaluation is often similar to the behavior of others as a standard for comparison. Group discussion process provides an opportunity to compare, with people and their views are similar and more polarized have love and admiration of the reaction, so the Group decided to become polarized.

結果 (英文) 2:

Some people think of the impact on individual groups of destructive behavior because groups often lack the intellect, but also blind radical. But from another angle made with the process and decisions in Richangshenghuo many things, people often adopt the agreement method, draw on the strength of groups and organizations to advance, such as the establishment of various people's organizations, one of its purposes is this. Social psychologists study concluded that the group will discuss improving its original members of opinions and views. If most people tend to view the original text A, then after a group discussion, the extent of biased A case will be increased; if the original general ideas considered unsuitable Yian, after discussion, considered not suitable for Yian views would be more strongly what is called group polarization. Decisions tend to group polarization, depending on the population in the majority opinion held by previous groups and decided not to join. This means that if the majority of people on the original somewhat risky, so the group decided to be more adventurous; if the majority of the original conservative views, then decided to be more conservative groups. Group polarization generation, some scholars believe that through mutual debate, members of the group did not previously own Keyihuode or did not think the views and arguments, persuasive these new data, can make a person change the original decision. Explain social comparison theory emphasizes most people have their own evaluation of nature, and personal self-evaluation is often similar to the behavior of others as a standard of comparison. Process group discussions provide an opportunity for individuals compared with each other, with the average person and their views are similar but have a relatively large polarization of love and admiration of the reaction, it was decided to group polarization is apt.

結果 (英文) 3:

Some people believe that the impact of the group on the individual is destructive, because the behavior of the group is often lack of reason, and blind radical. But from another point of view, in daily life have many things processing and decision is often mining multi protocol method, rely on the community organizations and power to advance, such as establishment of the various people"s organizations, the purpose of this. Social psychology researchers conclude that group discussions will improve the original opinions and perceptions of their members. If most of the original tend to view a case, then after a group discussion, partial degree on a case will increase; if the original general insights that case B is not suitable, after the discussion that case B is not suitable for the views will be more intense, the predicate group polarization. The group"s decisions tend to be polarized, depending on the opinion of the majority of the group before joining the group. That is to say, if the majority of people had been on the risk of taking a risk, then the group"s decision would be more risky; if the majority of the original opinion is more conservative, then the group"s decision will be more conservative. Group polarization, some scholars think through the debate with each other, the group members can get their original or no opinion did not think and say a word, the new data is persuasive, can make a person change the original decision. Interpretation of social comparison theory emphasizes the general who has her own nature evaluation and self evaluation and often to similar to other people"s behavior as compared with the standard. Group discussion process for individual provides a chance to compare each other, and ordinary people and their views similar and more polarization of mostly have love and admiration of the reaction, so decisions of the group easy to increasingly in polarization.