高特是说，我们可以欣赏在相互比较的EMI和亚伦的作品输出权。亚伦的图纸

高特是说，我们可以欣赏在相互比较的EMI和亚伦的作品输出权。亚伦的图纸是更原始，但不太令人印象深刻的正式比电磁干扰的组成，因为每一个员工的算法和数据库。然而，这一入场是一致的论点反对的命题，数字艺术是一种艺术形式，只要亚伦和电磁干扰的情况下，是不喜欢的“1234”和一个突然的阵风。问题是是否有房间可以欣赏亚伦的图纸和EMI的歌曲而不用挤一阵风到相同的艺术形式为“1234”。如果计算机艺术有姊妹艺术形式，“生成艺术，其中的算法运行在电子计算机的AR输出的新作品

結果 (英文) 1:

Scott is saying, we can enjoy each other rights to EMI and Aaron's work output. Aaron's drawings are more primitive, but less impressive than electromagnetic interference, and because each employee's algorithm and database. However, this admission is the same argument against the proposition, digital art is an art form, as long as Aaron and EMI's case, is not like "1234" and a sudden gust. Question is whether there is room to appreciate Aaron's drawings and EMI songs without having to squeeze a gust of wind to the same art form is "1234". If the computer Arts has art form, "generative art, one of the running computer AR output of new work

結果 (英文) 2:

Scott is that we can admire in the works right output EMI and Aaron compared with each other. Aaron's drawing is more primitive, but less impressive than the formal composition of electromagnetic interference, because every employee algorithms and databases. However, this admission is consistent with the arguments against the proposition, digital art is an art form, as long as the circumstances under Aaron and electromagnetic interference, is not like "1234" and a sudden gust. The question is whether there is room can enjoy Aaron drawings and EMI songs without having to squeeze a gust of wind to the same art form as "1234." If your computer has a sister art forms of art, "generative art, which run the new algorithm works in the computer's output AR