Wal–Mart requested BAJI No. 8.20 (8

Wal–Mart requested BAJI No. 8.20 (8th ed.1994) which provided as follows:“The [owner] [occupant] [lessor] of premises is not negligent and is not liable for an injury suffered by a person on the premises which resulted from a dangerous or defective condition of which the [owner] [occupant] [lessor] had no knowledge, unless the condition existed for such a length of time that if the [owner] [occupant] [lessor] had exercised reasonable care in inspecting the premises the [[owner] [occupant] [lessor]] would have discovered the condition in time to remedy it or to give warning before the injury occurred.“[Nor may the [owner] [occupant] [lessor] be found to be negligent if, having exercised ordinary care, [he][or][she] discovered such a condition before the time of the injury, but not long enough before to provide [him] [or][her] the time reasonably necessary to remedy the condition or to give reasonable warning or to provide reasonable protection.]”

結果 (繁體中文) 1:

Wal–Mart requested BAJI No. 8.20 (8th ed.1994) which provided as follows:
“The [owner] [occupant] [lessor] of premises is not negligent and is not liable for an injury suffered by a person on the premises which resulted from a dangerous or defective condition of which the [owner] [occupant] [lessor] had no knowledge, unless the condition existed for such a length of time that if the [owner] [occupant] [lessor] had exercised reasonable care in inspecting the premises the [[owner] [occupant] [lessor]] would have discovered the condition in time to remedy it or to give warning before the injury occurred.
“[也可在[所有人] [乘員] [出租人]中找到，如果，已經行使普通護理，疏忽[他] [或] [她]的傷害的時候才發現這樣的情況，但還不夠長之前提供[他] [或] [她]的補救條件或給予合理的警告或提供合理的保護時間合理必要的。]“

結果 (繁體中文) 2:

沃爾瑪要求BAJI第8.20號（第8號ed.1994），提供如下：
"房地的[所有人][居住者][承租人]不疏忽，對因[所有人][居住者][承租人][承租人]不知道的危險或缺陷條件而在該處所遭受的損害不承擔責任，除非條件存在的時間如此之長，以至於如果[所有人][居住][承租人]在檢查處所時採取了合理的謹慎措施，[所有人][居住者][承租人]將及時發現該情況，以補救或在損害發生前發出警告.
"[所有人][居住者][承租人][承租人]如果行使了普通照用，[他][或][她]在損害發生前發現此種情況，但在提供[他][或][她]合理必要的時間之前，也不得認定為疏忽大意。補救條件或給予合理的警告或提供合理的保護。

結果 (繁體中文) 3:

沃爾瑪要求BAJI第8.20號（1994年第8版），其規定如下：
“房地的[所有人][占有人][出租人]並非疏忽大意，對因[所有人][占有人][出租人]不知道的危險或有缺陷的情况而造成的人在房地所受的傷害不負責任，除非條件存在的時間如此之長，以致如果[所有人][占有人][出租人]在檢查房地時採取了合理的謹慎，則[所有人][占有人][出租人]本應及時發現該條件，以便在傷害發生前予以補救或發出警告。
“[如果[所有人][占有人][出租人]在受到損害之前，在行使了一般注意之後，[他][或][她]發現了這種情況，也不能認定其疏忽大意，但在提供[他][或][她]補救條件、發出合理警告或提供合理保護所需的合理時間之前不久。”