This framing of what is allowed to

This framing of what is allowed to count matters because it often means attempting to remove the particular, to consider species as units in isolation from all others, and thus to remove specific bodies in encounter from the accounting, and when this happens something is lost in the knowing. Knowing in embodied encounters is a well of knowledge that is never detached, never nowhere, but always deeply emplaced and embodied, and always in contact with and attuned to other, more-than-human bodies. Analyses of remote data, by contrast, progressively erases the agencies of marine wildlife as traces are turned to data points cleaned of ‘noise’ and run through complex computer models. The former are not always more desirable than the latter, and both are imperfect translators of the presences of nonhuman others. However, while the scientific models generated from data collected in remote monitoring may predict a lot about abstract groups of wildlife in general, they tell little about marine animals as particular, individual living beings inextricably entwined in rapidly shifting area ecologies.

結果 (繁體中文) 1:

什麼是允許計數的問題，因為這往往意味著試圖刪除特定的，考慮在隔離物種單位從所有其他人，因此，從會計刪除特定的機構中相遇，而當這種情況發生的東西是失去了這個框架知的。在體現遭遇知道是一個很好的知識是永遠不會分開，永遠不通，但總是深深的安置和體現，並始終與接觸，並切合以外，更比人體。遠程數據的分析，相比之下，逐步清除海洋生物的機構作為痕跡轉向數據點清理的“噪音”，並通過複雜的計算機模型運行。前者並不總是比後者更加希望的，兩者都是非人人的派駐人員不完美的翻譯。然而，

結果 (繁體中文) 2:

這種允許計數的構圖很重要，因為它通常意味著試圖刪除特定物種，將物種視為與所有其它事物隔離的單位，從而從會計中去除遇到的特定身體，當發生某些情況時迷失在知情中。在所體現的相遇中，瞭解是一種永不分離、從不無處可尋的知識，但總是深深佈設和體現，並且始終與其他、比人類更符合人類的身體接觸和調諧。相比之下，對遠端資料的分析會逐漸抹去海洋野生動物的機構，因為痕跡被轉向清理"噪音"的資料點，並運行在複雜的電腦模型中。前者並不總是比後者更可取，而且兩者都是非人類他人存在的不完美的譯者。然而，雖然從遠端監測中收集的資料中生成的科學模型可以預測出很多關於抽象的野生動物群，但它們很少說明海洋動物，特別是個體生物，它們與快速交織在一起。移位區域生態。

結果 (繁體中文) 3:

我最近再次微笑的一個原因是你