再次，专家组的裁决与日本和美国的主张都有关系，因此上诉机构认为专家组并

再次，专家组的裁决与日本和美国的主张都有关系，因此上诉机构认为专家组并没有越权。最后，美国的申诉仅仅是针对“成熟无害的苹果”，因此无须对没有主张的事项（“非成熟无害苹果”）进行举证。

結果 (英文) 1:

Once again, the judgment of the expert group have a relationship with Japan and the United States claim, the Appellate Body found that the group of experts and not ultra vires. Finally, the complaint in the United States only for mature harmless Apple, therefore the burden of proof without no claims matters ("non-mature harmless Apple").

結果 (英文) 2:

Once again, the group's decision with Japan and the United States claims have relations, thus the appellate body that the panel was not ultra vires.Finally, the United States of America's appeal is only for "mature harmless apple", therefore does not need to have no opinions matters ("non mature harmless apple") proof.

結果 (英文) 3:

Again, the decision of the expert group with Japan and the United States claim there is a relationship, appellate body found that the Group of experts was not ultra vires. Finally, the United States complaint simply for "mature Apple-friendly" and therefore is not liable for matters did not advocate (the "non-matured Apple-friendly") of proof.