Finally, at his trial, Fred explain

Finally, at his trial, Fred explains his behavior, and argues that he is blameless and therefore deserves no punishment. He is, he explains, a great lover of chocolate. A couple of years ago, he was involved in a car accident, which resulted in some head trauma. Upon his release from hospital, having apparently suffered no lasting ill effects, he visited his favorite restaurant and ordered their famous rich dark chocolate mousse. Imagine his dismay when he discovered that his experience of the mousse was a pale shadow of its former self. The mousse tasted bland, slightly pleasant, but with none of the intense chocolaty flavor he remembered so well. The waiter assured him that the recipe was unchanged from the last time he had tasted it, just the day before his
accident. In some consternation, Fred rushed out to buy a bar of his favorite Belgian chocolate. Again, he was dismayed to discover that his experience of the chocolate was barely even pleasurable. Extensive investigation revealed that his experience of other foods remained unaffected, but chocolate, in all its forms, now tasted bland and insipid. Desperate for a solution to his problem, Fred visited a renowned gustatory neurologist, Dr. T. Bud. Extensive tests revealed that the accident had irreparably damaged the godiva gland, which secretes cocoamone, the hormone responsible for the experience of chocolate. Fred urgently requested hormone replacement therapy. Dr. Bud informed him that, until recently, there had been no known source of cocoamone, other than the human godiva gland, and that it was impossible to collect cocoamone from one person to be used by another. However, a chance discovery had altered the situation. A forensic veterinary surgeon, performing an autopsy on a severely abused puppy, had discovered high concentrations of cocoamone in the puppy’s brain. It turned out that puppies, who don’t normally produce cocoamone, could be stimulated to do so by extended periods of severe stress and suffering. The research, which led to this discovery, while gaining tenure for its authors, had not been widely publicized, for fear of antagonizing animal welfare groups. Although this research clearly gave Fred the hope of tasting chocolate again, there were no commercially available sources of puppy-derived cocoamone. Lack of demand, combined with fear of bad publicity, had deterred drug companies from getting into the puppy torturing business. Fred appeals to the court to imagine his anguish, on discovering that a solution to his severe deprivation was possible, but not readily available. But he wasn’t inclined to sit around bemoaning his cruel fate. He did what any chocolate lover would do. He read the research, and set up his own cocoamone collection lab in his basement. Six months of intense puppy suffering, followed by a brutal death, produced enough cocoamone to last him a week, hence the twenty-six cages. He isn’t a sadist or an animal abuser, he explains. If there were a method of collecting cocoamone without torturing puppies, he would gladly employ it. He derives no pleasure from the suffering of the puppies itself. He sympathizes with those who are horrified by the pain and misery of the animals, but the court must realize that human pleasure is at stake. The puppies, while undeniably cute, are mere animals. He admits that he would be just as healthy without chocolate, if not more so. But this isn’t a matter of survival or health. His life would be unacceptably impover- ished without the experience of chocolate.

結果 (繁體中文) 1:

最後，在他的審判，弗雷德解釋他的行為，並認為他是清白的因此不是罪有應得。他解釋說，他是巧克力的一位酷愛。幾年前，他參與一些頭部外傷導致的車禍了。從醫院，顯然遭受沒有持久的不良影響，他獲釋後他訪問了他最喜歡的餐館，並下令他們著名的豐富黑巧克力慕斯。想像他沮喪的是，當他發現他的摩絲的經驗是其前身的一個淡淡陰影。慕斯味道淡而無味，稍微令人愉快，但沒有強烈的巧克力味道他記得這麼好。服務員向他保證食譜是從他嘗過，只是他的前一天的最後一次不變事故。在有些驚愕，弗雷德沖出去買一條他最喜歡的比利時巧克力。他又很沮喪地發現他的巧克力的經歷是幾乎沒有即使是愉快。廣泛調查他的其他食物的經驗仍不受影響，但巧克力，一切形式，現在嘗到了淡而無味。急需解決他的問題的辦法，弗雷德參觀了著名的味覺神經，博士 T.芽。廣泛測試顯示，事故發生了不可挽回的 godiva 腺，分泌 cocoamone，激素負責巧克力的經驗。弗雷德迫切要求激素替代療法。博士芽通知他，直到最近，一直沒有已知的 cocoamone，除了人類 godiva 腺，來源和那它是不可能從一個人使用的另一種收集 cocoamone。然而，一個機會發現改變了局面。法醫的獸醫，對嚴重虐待的小狗，進行屍檢發現了高濃度的 cocoamone 在小狗的大腦。原來，小狗，不能正常產生 cocoamone，可能是刺激這樣做長時間的嚴重的精神壓力和痛苦。研究，導致這一發現，同時為其作者，獲得保有了不廣泛的宣傳，以免拮抗動物福利團體。雖然這項研究清楚地又給了弗雷德希望品嘗巧克力，沒有商業上可用的小狗源性 cocoamone 來源。需求，加上恐懼的負面宣傳，缺乏阻止藥物公司進入小狗折磨業務。弗雷德上訴到法院去想像他的痛苦，發現他嚴重剝奪的解決方案是可能的但不是容易得到的。但他並不傾向于坐著哀歎他殘忍的命運。他做任何巧克力情人會做的事。他閱讀研究，並建立了他自己在他的地下室的 cocoamone 集合實驗室。六個月的激烈小狗的痛苦，其次是殘酷的死亡，產生足夠的 cocoamone，最後他一周，因此二十六個籠子。他解釋說他不是個虐待狂或動物的施虐者。要是收集 cocoamone 沒有虐待小狗的方法，他會很樂意雇用它。他本身從痛苦的小狗得到沒有樂趣。他同情那些被嚇壞了的痛苦和苦難的動物，但法院必須認識到人類快樂是岌岌可危。這些小狗，雖然不可否認的是可愛的是單純的動物。他承認，他將作為健康不含巧克力，，如果不更是如此。但這並不是生存或健康的問題。他的生活就會令人無法接受百鳳梨沒有巧克力的經驗。

結果 (繁體中文) 2:

最後，在他的審判，弗雷德解釋他的行為，並認為他是無辜的，因此不值得處罰。他是，他解釋說，巧克力一個偉大的情人。幾年前，他被捲入了一場車禍，導致一些頭部外傷。在他的出院，顯然是有沒有遭受持久的不良影響，他拜訪了他最喜歡的餐館，並責令其著名的豐富的黑巧克力慕斯。試想一下，令他沮喪的時候，他發現他的摩絲的經驗是其前自我的一種蒼白的影子。摩絲吃起來淡，稍愉快的，但沒有用的巧克力強烈味道，他記得這麼好。服務員向他保證，配方是從他嘗了，就在一天前，他最後一次持平
事故。在有些驚愕，弗雷德衝出買他最喜歡的比利時巧克力的酒吧。此外，他沮喪地發現，他的巧克力的經驗是幾乎沒有，甚至與眾不同的風格。多方調查發現，他的其他食物的體驗不受影響，但巧克力，各種形式，現在嚐到了淡而無味。不顧一切地想要解決他的問題，弗雷德參觀著名的神經學家味覺，T博士芽。廣泛的測試表明，事故是不可修復的GODIVA腺體，它分泌cocoamone，激素負責巧克力的經驗。弗雷德緊急要求激素替代療法。芽醫生告訴他，直到最近，曾有過cocoamone沒有已知的來源，比人類腺GODIVA等，而這是不可能從一個人收集cocoamone由另一個使用。然而，一個偶然的發現改變了這種情況。法醫獸醫，對嚴重虐待的小狗進行屍檢，已在小狗的腦部發現了高濃度的cocoamone的。原來，小狗，誰不正常產生cocoamone，可以通過刺激嚴重的壓力和痛苦的長時間這樣做。這項研究，這導致了這一發現，而它的作者獲得使用權，沒有被廣泛宣傳，怕激怒動物福利團體。儘管這項研究清楚地給了弗雷德再次品嚐巧克力的希望，有小狗衍生cocoamone沒有市售來源。需求不足，害怕負面宣傳相結合，已經從進入小狗折磨業務阻止製藥公司。弗雷德上訴到法院去想像他的痛苦，就發現，他的嚴重剝奪的解決方案是可能的，但不容易買到。但他不傾向於坐著哀嘆他的殘酷命運。他做了任何巧克力情人會做。他讀的研究，並成立了自己的收藏cocoamone實驗室在他的地下室。半年的緊張小狗痛苦，隨後是殘酷的死亡，產生了足夠的cocoamone一個星期，最後他，因此26籠。他不是一個虐待狂或動物虐待者，他解釋說。如果有收集cocoamone沒有折磨小狗的方法，他會很樂意使用它。他從派生的小狗本身的痛苦沒有快樂。他同情那些誰是痛苦和動物的痛苦嚇壞了，但法院必須認識到，人的快樂是岌岌可危。小狗，而不可否認的可愛，僅僅是動物。他承認，他只是沒有巧克力一樣健康，如果不是更多的話。但這不是生存或健康問題。他的生活將沒有巧克力的經驗不可接受impover- ished。