The negative influence on the way w

The negative influence on the way we interact with others

As human beings, our brains have an inherent tendency to prefer simplification over complexity. Computer interaction fits this perfectly. Founded on the premise of minimal or constrained social cues, most of which can be summed up in an emoticon, it does not require much cognitive effort.

A chatbot doesn’t need the emotional involvement and interpretation of nonverbal cues required by humans, thus making our interaction with it much easier. This goes hand in hand with our brain’s tendency toward cognitive laziness. Repeated interactions with chatbots trigger the constructions of a new mental model that will inform these interactions. It will be experienced as a different state of mind from which we interpret social interactions.

When a human being interacts with another human being — for example, a friend — we are driven by the desire to take part in a shared activity. Communication with a bot is different — the gratification derives from a change of mental state, a sort of detachment: You can achieve your goal (getting help, information, even a feeling of companionship) with no immediate “cost.” No investment is required: there’s no need to be nice, to smile, be involved or be emotionally considerate.

It sounds convenient — but the problem arises when we become addicted to this form of bot interaction and slowly start developing a preference for “easy communication.” This can lead to secondary problems.

結果 (繁體中文) 3:

我們與他人互動的管道的負面影響作為人類，我們的大腦有一種固有的傾向，喜歡簡單化的複雜性。電腦互動適合這個完美的。建立在最小的前提或約束的社會線索，其中大部分可以歸結為一個表情，它不需要太多的努力。一個聊天機器人不需要情感和非語言的暗示所要求的人的解釋，它更容易使我們的互動。這與我們的大腦的認知懶惰的傾向是攜手的。與聊天機器人重複的相互作用引發一個新的心理模型，將通知這些相互作用的結構。它將經歷一個不同的精神狀態，從我們解釋社會的相互作用。當一個人與另一個人進行互動-例如，一個朋友-我們是由渴望參加一個共同的活動的願望。與機器人通信不同的滿足感來自於改變心理狀態，一種脫離：你可以實現你的目標（獲得幫助，資訊，甚至陪伴的感覺）沒有直接的“成本”。沒有投資要求：不需要很好，微笑，參與或是感情上的體貼。這聽起來很方便，但問題在於當我們沉迷於這種形式的BOT互動慢慢開始發展一種“易溝通偏好”。這可以導致繼發性的問題。