Aphasia test results. Changes in la

Aphasia test results. Changes in language performance on the Aachen Aphasia Test (AAT; see panel A) and on the Action CommunicationTest (ACT; see panel B). Thirty individuals with chronic post-stroke aphasia were randomly assigned to one of the two Groups: patients receiving IntensiveLanguage-Action Therapy with 4 hours (Group I) or with 2 hours of daily practice (Group II). All patients went through an initial waiting period (‘baseline’)and two successive training intervals (‘therapy phase’). Each trial phase lasted 2 weeks. Testing took place at four points in Time: 2 weeks before treatmentonset (T0), at treatment onset (T1), after the first training interval (T2) and after the second training interval (T3). Focusing on changes in languageperformance separately for each trial phase [Δ(T1–T0); Δ(T2–T1); Δ(T3–T2)], statistics refer to significant paired-sample t-tests (asterisks embedded in bargraphs) and to a significant Time-by-Group interaction, as revealed by repeated-measures analyses of variance (asterisks displayed above bar graphs;*P

結果 (繁體中文) 1:

Aphasia test results. Changes in language performance on the Aachen Aphasia Test (AAT; see panel A) and on the Action Communication
Test (ACT; see panel B). Thirty individuals with chronic post-stroke aphasia were randomly assigned to one of the two Groups: patients receiving Intensive
Language-Action Therapy with 4 hours (Group I) or with 2 hours of daily practice (Group II). All patients went through an initial waiting period (‘baseline’)
and two successive training intervals (‘therapy phase’). Each trial phase lasted 2 weeks. Testing took place at four points in Time: 2 weeks before treatment
onset (T0), at treatment onset (T1), after the first training interval (T2) and after the second training interval (T3). Focusing on changes in language
分別表現每個試驗相位[Δ（T1-T0）; Δ（T2-T1）; Δ（T3-T2）]，統計指顯著配對樣本t檢驗（嵌入在巴星號
的曲線圖）和到顯著時間逐組相互作用，通過重複測量所揭示的方差分析（上文欄中顯示星號圖表;
* P

結果 (繁體中文) 2:

失語症測試結果。Aachen失語測試（AAT;見面板A）和行動通訊語言性能的變化
測試（ACT;參見面板 B）。30名慢性中風後失語症患者被隨機分配到兩組之一：接受強化治療的患者
語言動作治療4小時（第一組）或2小時每日練習（第二組）。所有患者都經歷了最初的等待期（"基線"）
和連續兩個訓練間隔（"治療階段"）。每個試驗階段持續2周。測試在四個時間點進行：治療前2周
發病（T0），治療開始（T1），第一個訓練間隔（T2）後和第二個訓練間隔（T3） 之後。關注語言的變化
每個試驗階段分別的性能 [（T1_T0）;*（T2_T1）;*（T3_T2）]，統計資料是指重要的成對樣本 t 檢驗（嵌入在橫條圖中的星號）
圖表），以及顯著的按組時間交互，如方差的重複度量分析（橫條圖上方顯示的星號;
*P

結果 (繁體中文) 3:

失語症測試結果。阿亨失語症測試（AAT；見A組）和動作交流中語言表現的變化
測試（動作；見面板B）。30例慢性腦卒中後失語症患者被隨機分為兩組：接受强化治療的患者
語言動作治療4小時（組一）或2小時的日常實踐（組二）。所有患者都經歷了最初的等待期（“基線”）
以及兩個連續的訓練間隔（“治療階段”）。每個試驗階段持續2周。測試在四個時間點進行：治療前2周
起病（T0），治療起病（T1），第一次訓練間隔（T2）後和第二次訓練間隔（T3）後。關注語言的變化
每個試驗階段的效能分別為[Δ（T1-T0）；Δ（T2-T1）；Δ（T3-T2）]，統計資料指的是顯著的成對樣本t-試驗（條形圖中嵌入星號
圖）和一個重要的時間組相互作用，如重複量測的方差分析所揭示的（星號顯示在柱狀圖上方；
*第頁