1
00:00:03,879 --> 00:00:09,770
Wed
2
00:00:09,770 --> 00:00:16,650
Wed
3
00:00:16,650 --> 00:00:18,220
in this that while we're gonna be
4
00:00:18,220 --> 00:00:22,090
comparing two images from two different
cameras to each other
5
00:00:22,090 --> 00:00:26,040
we're also gonna go ahead and Iran
adjustments to both to see what the
6
00:00:26,040 --> 00:00:28,119
similarities and the differences or
7
00:00:28,119 --> 00:00:31,309
now I've always said that
8
00:00:31,309 --> 00:00:35,040
gear is not important and should
concentrate on technique
9
00:00:35,040 --> 00:00:39,110
an composition 10 other things before
you
10
00:00:39,110 --> 00:00:43,500
go ahead upgrade your gear with these
two raw files I wanna show you how
11
00:00:43,500 --> 00:00:44,410
similar
12
00:00:44,410 --> 00:00:47,420
is raw files are hi able to walk away
13
00:00:47,420 --> 00:00:50,980
taking almost the same exact image with
14
00:00:50,980 --> 00:00:54,380
a camera cost want health above the
price
15
00:00:54,380 --> 00:00:58,050
the d800e went for about 3
16
00:00:58,050 --> 00:01:01,770
a 3,000 when it came out that and the
17
00:01:01,770 --> 00:01:08,869
d3000 went for I i think maybe it's
maybe somewhere around four hundred
18
00:01:08,869 --> 00:01:10,090
dollars now that there's
19
00:01:10,090 --> 00:01:14,140
to at least two were to nor versions and
I know there's pressure D
20
00:01:14,140 --> 00:01:18,689
3200 there might be even at the 3300 I'm
not so sure about that
21
00:01:18,689 --> 00:01:24,130
but the point is that it cost
significantly less than that the 800 so
22
00:01:24,130 --> 00:01:28,200
this image over here was taken worth the
de 800
23
00:01:28,200 --> 00:01:33,560
and this one over here what the d3000 I
actually like the one with the d3000
24
00:01:33,560 --> 00:01:37,329
a little more a composition wise because
it including this
25
00:01:37,329 --> 00:01:40,969
other column right here in the
foreground the t-800
26
00:01:40,969 --> 00:01:44,509
um does not have the same depth that
27
00:01:44,509 --> 00:01:49,850
that the 3,000 had by I know right off
the bat that the dynamic range on a deer
28
00:01:49,850 --> 00:01:51,399
100 is gonna be way better
29
00:01:51,399 --> 00:01:54,899
so let's go ahead and start editing both
to see what we could get
30
00:01:54,899 --> 00:01:58,159
so start with the 800 file first
31
00:01:58,159 --> 00:02:02,090
an ago the lighting is better a space to
if you look at the
32
00:02:02,090 --> 00:02:06,499
d3r thousand you don't have as much
detail over here on the left side of his
33
00:02:06,499 --> 00:02:07,229
face it
34
00:02:07,229 --> 00:02:10,349
terrible on our but there could be me
and
35
00:02:10,349 --> 00:02:11,780
when I was shooting
36
00:02:11,780 --> 00:02:15,040
it's not really the camera so let's go
ahead and
37
00:02:15,040 --> 00:02:20,880
at the 800 file first so but still had a
a little bit of clarity
38
00:02:20,880 --> 00:02:24,950
it'll just are often up his I'll
39
00:02:24,950 --> 00:02:28,310
facial features first so let's go ahead
and
40
00:02:28,310 --> 00:02:31,800
and compare up just
41
00:02:31,800 --> 00:02:34,970
before and after this so that's before
42
00:02:34,970 --> 00:02:38,260
where you can see the images slightly on
the softer side
43
00:02:38,260 --> 00:02:42,120
and then I turn a preview on which if
you bear if you can see the preview
44
00:02:42,120 --> 00:02:45,320
its PR your keyboard so you're using
Adobe CC
45
00:02:45,320 --> 00:02:49,080
you're not gonna have to prove your
treatment it P and that after
46
00:02:49,080 --> 00:02:52,320
where became a little sharper so before
and after
47
00:02:52,320 --> 00:02:55,600
that's why I like using clearly I don't
go too high on it because what would
48
00:02:55,600 --> 00:02:56,870
happen if you do too much
49
00:02:56,870 --> 00:03:02,290
suddenly everything just goes crazy a so
let's go back to around her
50
00:03:02,290 --> 00:03:06,390
and bringing and a little bit of whites
just to give the image
51
00:03:06,390 --> 00:03:11,100
extra boost their light leads on back
out
52
00:03:11,100 --> 00:03:16,230
paralyzed image I'm gonna bring back
some determine highlighter feel like
53
00:03:16,230 --> 00:03:17,340
this can maybe
54
00:03:17,340 --> 00:03:20,720
starting to get to a blown-out so for
55
00:03:20,720 --> 00:03:24,959
a little bit more also bring back to
palm trees over there on the left side
56
00:03:24,959 --> 00:03:29,420
that's pretty cool respect internet
preview our
57
00:03:29,420 --> 00:03:37,489
that's before and after Marino had open
up the shadows just a little bit so it's
58
00:03:37,489 --> 00:03:39,980
a little more determined here and share
59
00:03:39,980 --> 00:03:45,640
they read or write about their
60
00:03:45,640 --> 00:03:49,140
and I still wanna do is adjust this
white power has taken over to the left
61
00:03:49,140 --> 00:03:49,739
side
62
00:03:49,739 --> 00:03:54,720
all the way to the right side back and
forth until we find a spot we like to
63
00:03:54,720 --> 00:03:56,910
read about their lives do the same thing
with the tear
64
00:03:56,910 --> 00:04:03,769
write a little bit more towards a
greenside actually right around there
65
00:04:03,769 --> 00:04:06,989
the jump over to
66
00:04:06,989 --> 00:04:10,430
our HS out there alleging they just felt
up to
67
00:04:10,430 --> 00:04:14,340
floral the leading on the skin sometimes
I like where
68
00:04:14,340 --> 00:04:17,870
the rest to the images let you know I
like how bright this is the video or
69
00:04:17,870 --> 00:04:21,500
darken the skin without darkening the
left side of the image
70
00:04:21,500 --> 00:04:24,780
so what I would do is come over here to
the reds and oranges my kid
71
00:04:24,780 --> 00:04:28,980
go to a darker side Mazzetti his skin
just became darker
72
00:04:28,980 --> 00:04:32,940
so over but this gives us the time a
bitter
73
00:04:32,940 --> 00:04:37,730
mister a preview or not that's before
and
74
00:04:37,730 --> 00:04:41,110
that that after
75
00:04:41,110 --> 00:04:44,380
so there is no I like scaring the darker
side
76
00:04:44,380 --> 00:04:48,340
is mainly because the darker it is the
more
77
00:04:48,340 --> 00:04:51,920
a chance to see detail in the scare so I
start with the
78
00:04:51,920 --> 00:04:56,060
with the skin on the darker side I
slowly brightness and in the proper
79
00:04:56,060 --> 00:04:56,770
areas
80
00:04:56,770 --> 00:05:00,360
and like that he could really see the
detail in the skin well
81
00:05:00,360 --> 00:05:03,400
the scariest too bright sunroom just
like blown out and
82
00:05:03,400 --> 00:05:07,200
it her looks flat when the skinners dart
83
00:05:07,200 --> 00:05:10,580
you're able to just brighten it up in a
proper areas have
84
00:05:10,580 --> 00:05:15,190
it will give the skin so much more to
that's why start off with a slightly
85
00:05:15,190 --> 00:05:18,390
darker image so let's jump over to
86
00:05:18,390 --> 00:05:22,550
up before we do that a little are in
this image so a further straightening
87
00:05:22,550 --> 00:05:23,100
tool
88
00:05:23,100 --> 00:05:26,130
and just trace any lime let go
89
00:05:26,130 --> 00:05:31,400
and the Photoshop will armor camera
automatically create a crop based on
90
00:05:31,400 --> 00:05:31,840
that
91
00:05:31,840 --> 00:05:37,860
online and there we go like that I was
jump over to our next image over here
92
00:05:37,860 --> 00:05:41,070
and right off the bat has given as too
bright
93
00:05:41,070 --> 00:05:44,100
and I need to bring back some
94
00:05:44,100 --> 00:05:47,650
some detail this get over here on the
left side
95
00:05:47,650 --> 00:05:52,540
so let's zoom back daughter resolution
that actually not that bad but that the
96
00:05:52,540 --> 00:05:53,430
three thousand
97
00:05:53,430 --> 00:05:57,090
on did 100 obviously the resolution is
way better
98
00:05:57,090 --> 00:06:01,950
but when it comes to resolution it it's
not the resolution and mixer
99
00:06:01,950 --> 00:06:05,470
image look sharp resolution will retain
100
00:06:05,470 --> 00:06:08,930
shirt mister image no matter how pay you
print it so
101
00:06:08,930 --> 00:06:12,310
a DA 100 I print a billboard an up close
102
00:06:12,310 --> 00:06:16,860
it'll be really sure even that day the
d3000 obviously
103
00:06:16,860 --> 00:06:18,580
will not be that sharp went long
104
00:06:18,580 --> 00:06:22,080
that day when you're looking at these
images I'm any monitor
105
00:06:22,080 --> 00:06:25,500
and right now I'm using a fork a monitor
and the image
106
00:06:25,500 --> 00:06:29,879
is gonna look equally as sharp if you're
not assuming you're
107
00:06:29,879 --> 00:06:33,550
so anyone who sees but d3000 image on
social media
108
00:06:33,550 --> 00:06:37,310
where is that the 800 up image on social
media
109
00:06:37,310 --> 00:06:40,979
they're both gonna look equally as sharp
because
110
00:06:40,979 --> 00:06:46,000
a screen is somewhere around let it 1200
pixels by 1900 pixels
111
00:06:46,000 --> 00:06:50,159
and let's check to see the what the
112
00:06:50,159 --> 00:06:55,900
dimensions are over here and that the
three thousand its 3800 by 2500 so
113
00:06:55,900 --> 00:07:00,620
the image has more pixels than you're
able to see it are
114
00:07:00,620 --> 00:07:04,159
a monitor which is a regular minor 1200
by
115
00:07:04,159 --> 00:07:08,280
1920 so when people say oh I'll
116
00:07:08,280 --> 00:07:12,909
I'm getting that the 800 take sharper
images if you're only looking at these
117
00:07:12,909 --> 00:07:13,620
images
118
00:07:13,620 --> 00:07:16,939
on a computer screen and you're not
zooming in the Derby
119
00:07:16,939 --> 00:07:20,580
equally as sharp so what makes image
120
00:07:20,580 --> 00:07:25,180
pop is not really the resolution on the
camera at your lighting it's the
121
00:07:25,180 --> 00:07:25,960
contrast
122
00:07:25,960 --> 00:07:29,389
100:00:03,879 --> 00:00:09,770Wed200:00:09,770 --> 00:00:16,650Wed300:00:16,650 --> 00:00:18,220in this that while we're gonna be400:00:18,220 --> 00:00:22,090comparing two images from two differentcameras to each other500:00:22,090 --> 00:00:26,040we're also gonna go ahead and Iranadjustments to both to see what the600:00:26,040 --> 00:00:28,119similarities and the differences or700:00:28,119 --> 00:00:31,309now I've always said that800:00:31,309 --> 00:00:35,040gear is not important and shouldconcentrate on technique900:00:35,040 --> 00:00:39,110an composition 10 other things beforeyou1000:00:39,110 --> 00:00:43,500go ahead upgrade your gear with thesetwo raw files I wanna show you how1100:00:43,500 --> 00:00:44,410similar1200:00:44,410 --> 00:00:47,420is raw files are hi able to walk away1300:00:47,420 --> 00:00:50,980taking almost the same exact image with1400:00:50,980 --> 00:00:54,380a camera cost want health above theprice1500:00:54,380 --> 00:00:58,050the d800e went for about 31600:00:58,050 --> 00:01:01,770a 3,000 when it came out that and the1700:01:01,770 --> 00:01:08,869d3000 went for I i think maybe it'smaybe somewhere around four hundred1800:01:08,869 --> 00:01:10,090dollars now that there's1900:01:10,090 --> 00:01:14,140to at least two were to nor versions andI know there's pressure D2000:01:14,140 --> 00:01:18,6893200 there might be even at the 3300 I'mnot so sure about that2100:01:18,689 --> 00:01:24,130but the point is that it costsignificantly less than that the 800 so2200:01:24,130 --> 00:01:28,200this image over here was taken worth thede 8002300:01:28,200 --> 00:01:33,560and this one over here what the d3000 Iactually like the one with the d30002400:01:33,560 --> 00:01:37,329a little more a composition wise becauseit including this2500:01:37,329 --> 00:01:40,969other column right here in theforeground the t-8002600:01:40,969 --> 00:01:44,509um does not have the same depth that2700:01:44,509 --> 00:01:49,850that the 3,000 had by I know right offthe bat that the dynamic range on a deer2800:01:49,850 --> 00:01:51,399100 is gonna be way better2900:01:51,399 --> 00:01:54,899so let's go ahead and start editing bothto see what we could get3000:01:54,899 --> 00:01:58,159so start with the 800 file first3100:01:58,159 --> 00:02:02,090an ago the lighting is better a space toif you look at the3200:02:02,090 --> 00:02:06,499d3r thousand you don't have as muchdetail over here on the left side of his3300:02:06,499 --> 00:02:07,229face it3400:02:07,229 --> 00:02:10,349terrible on our but there could be meand3500:02:10,349 --> 00:02:11,780when I was shooting3600:02:11,780 --> 00:02:15,040it's not really the camera so let's goahead and3700:02:15,040 --> 00:02:20,880at the 800 file first so but still had aa little bit of clarity3800:02:20,880 --> 00:02:24,950it'll just are often up his I'll3900:02:24,950 --> 00:02:28,310facial features first so let's go aheadand4000:02:28,310 --> 00:02:31,800and compare up just4100:02:31,800 --> 00:02:34,970before and after this so that's before4200:02:34,970 --> 00:02:38,260where you can see the images slightly onthe softer side4300:02:38,260 --> 00:02:42,120and then I turn a preview on which ifyou bear if you can see the preview4400:02:42,120 --> 00:02:45,320its PR your keyboard so you're usingAdobe CC4500:02:45,320 --> 00:02:49,080you're not gonna have to prove yourtreatment it P and that after4600:02:49,080 --> 00:02:52,320where became a little sharper so beforeand after4700:02:52,320 --> 00:02:55,600that's why I like using clearly I don'tgo too high on it because what would4800:02:55,600 --> 00:02:56,870happen if you do too much4900:02:56,870 --> 00:03:02,290suddenly everything just goes crazy a solet's go back to around her5000:03:02,290 --> 00:03:06,390and bringing and a little bit of whitesjust to give the image5100:03:06,390 --> 00:03:11,100extra boost their light leads on backout5200:03:11,100 --> 00:03:16,230paralyzed image I'm gonna bring backsome determine highlighter feel like5300:03:16,230 --> 00:03:17,340this can maybe5400:03:17,340 --> 00:03:20,720starting to get to a blown-out so for5500:03:20,720 --> 00:03:24,959a little bit more also bring back topalm trees over there on the left side5600:03:24,959 --> 00:03:29,420that's pretty cool respect internetpreview our5700:03:29,420 --> 00:03:37,489that's before and after Marino had openup the shadows just a little bit so it's5800:03:37,489 --> 00:03:39,980a little more determined here and share5900:03:39,980 --> 00:03:45,640they read or write about their6000:03:45,640 --> 00:03:49,140and I still wanna do is adjust thiswhite power has taken over to the left6100:03:49,140 --> 00:03:49,739side6200:03:49,739 --> 00:03:54,720all the way to the right side back andforth until we find a spot we like to6300:03:54,720 --> 00:03:56,910read about their lives do the same thingwith the tear6400:03:56,910 --> 00:04:03,769write a little bit more towards agreenside actually right around there6500:04:03,769 --> 00:04:06,989the jump over to6600:04:06,989 --> 00:04:10,430our HS out there alleging they just feltup to6700:04:10,430 --> 00:04:14,340floral the leading on the skin sometimesI like where6800:04:14,340 --> 00:04:17,870the rest to the images let you know Ilike how bright this is the video or6900:04:17,870 --> 00:04:21,500darken the skin without darkening theleft side of the image7000:04:21,500 --> 00:04:24,780so what I would do is come over here tothe reds and oranges my kid7100:04:24,780 --> 00:04:28,980go to a darker side Mazzetti his skinjust became darker7200:04:28,980 --> 00:04:32,940so over but this gives us the time abitter7300:04:32,940 --> 00:04:37,730mister a preview or not that's beforeand7400:04:37,730 --> 00:04:41,110that that after7500:04:41,110 --> 00:04:44,380so there is no I like scaring the darkerside7600:04:44,380 --> 00:04:48,340is mainly because the darker it is themore7700:04:48,340 --> 00:04:51,920a chance to see detail in the scare so Istart with the7800:04:51,920 --> 00:04:56,060with the skin on the darker side Islowly brightness and in the proper7900:04:56,060 --> 00:04:56,770areas8000:04:56,770 --> 00:05:00,360and like that he could really see thedetail in the skin well8100:05:00,360 --> 00:05:03,400the scariest too bright sunroom justlike blown out and8200:05:03,400 --> 00:05:07,200it her looks flat when the skinners dart8300:05:07,200 --> 00:05:10,580you're able to just brighten it up in aproper areas have8400:05:10,580 --> 00:05:15,190it will give the skin so much more tothat's why start off with a slightly8500:05:15,190 --> 00:05:18,390darker image so let's jump over to8600:05:18,390 --> 00:05:22,550up before we do that a little are inthis image so a further straightening8700:05:22,550 --> 00:05:23,100tool8800:05:23,100 --> 00:05:26,130and just trace any lime let go8900:05:26,130 --> 00:05:31,400and the Photoshop will armor cameraautomatically create a crop based on9000:05:31,400 --> 00:05:31,840that9100:05:31,840 --> 00:05:37,860online and there we go like that I wasjump over to our next image over here9200:05:37,860 --> 00:05:41,070and right off the bat has given as toobright9300:05:41,070 --> 00:05:44,100and I need to bring back some9400:05:44,100 --> 00:05:47,650some detail this get over here on theleft side9500:05:47,650 --> 00:05:52,540so let's zoom back daughter resolutionthat actually not that bad but that the9600:05:52,540 --> 00:05:53,430three thousand9700:05:53,430 --> 00:05:57,090on did 100 obviously the resolution isway better9800:05:57,090 --> 00:06:01,950but when it comes to resolution it it'snot the resolution and mixer9900:06:01,950 --> 00:06:05,470image look sharp resolution will retain10000:06:05,470 --> 00:06:08,930shirt mister image no matter how pay youprint it so10100:06:08,930 --> 00:06:12,310a DA 100 I print a billboard an up close10200:06:12,310 --> 00:06:16,860it'll be really sure even that day thed3000 obviously10300:06:16,860 --> 00:06:18,580will not be that sharp went long10400:06:18,580 --> 00:06:22,080that day when you're looking at theseimages I'm any monitor10500:06:22,080 --> 00:06:25,500and right now I'm using a fork a monitorand the image10600:06:25,500 --> 00:06:29,879is gonna look equally as sharp if you'renot assuming you're10700:06:29,879 --> 00:06:33,550so anyone who sees but d3000 image onsocial media10800:06:33,550 --> 00:06:37,310where is that the 800 up image on socialmedia10900:06:37,310 --> 00:06:40,979they're both gonna look equally as sharpbecause11000:06:40,979 --> 00:06:46,000a screen is somewhere around let it 1200pixels by 1900 pixels11100:06:46,000 --> 00:06:50,159and let's check to see the what the11200:06:50,159 --> 00:06:55,900dimensions are over here and that thethree thousand its 3800 by 2500 so11300:06:55,900 --> 00:07:00,620the image has more pixels than you'reable to see it are11400:07:00,620 --> 00:07:04,159a monitor which is a regular minor 1200by11500:07:04,159 --> 00:07:08,2801920 so when people say oh I'll11600:07:08,280 --> 00:07:12,909I'm getting that the 800 take sharperimages if you're only looking at these11700:07:12,909 --> 00:07:13,620images11800:07:13,620 --> 00:07:16,939on a computer screen and you're notzooming in the Derby11900:07:16,939 --> 00:07:20,580equally as sharp so what makes image12000:07:20,580 --> 00:07:25,180pop is not really the resolution on thecamera at your lighting it's the12100:07:25,180 --> 00:07:25,960contrast12200:07:25,960 --> 00:07:29,389
正在翻譯中..
![](//zhcntimg.ilovetranslation.com/pic/loading_3.gif?v=b9814dd30c1d7c59_8619)