Only a few studies have compared th

Only a few studies have compared the diameter of CNF obtained using different techniques. Most of these studies agreed that TEM obtains the highest degree ofprecision in CNF characterization, followed by SEM andAFM. Depending on the technique, the sample preparationis different, which can also have an impact on themeasurement accuracy. In the case of TEM, as alreadymentioned, the preparation of the sample is delicate, comparedto AFM, but the resolution and precision of theimages using AFM are not as good as those of TEM.

結果 (繁體中文) 1:

此外，木質素和半纖維素含量對CNF的形態有影響。MFC的直徑產生與含木質素紙漿較大，不管所使用的紙漿的來源的。半纖維素也通過限制[130274]納米纖維之間的結塊影響CNF直徑分佈。

結果 (繁體中文) 2:

此外，木質素和血細胞素含量對CNF的形態有影響。使用含木質素紙漿生產的MFC的直徑更大，無論所用紙漿的來源如何。血細胞柳素還通過限制納米纖維之間的聚集[130，274]影響CNF直徑分佈。

結果 (繁體中文) 3:

木質素和半纖維素的含量對CNF的形態有影響。無論所用紙漿的來源如何，含木質素紙漿的MFC直徑都較大。半纖維素還通過限制納米纖維之間的團聚來影響CNF直徑分佈[130274]。