专家组判定日本的措施不是在“相关科学证据不充分的情况下”采取的。因为就

专家组判定日本的措施不是在“相关科学证据不充分的情况下”采取的。因为就本案针对火疫病提供苹果传播的风险进行检疫措施的争议，己经进行了200多年的相关科学研究和实践试验研究，已有众多高质量的重要证据针对火疫病通过苹果传播的风险这一特定的科学问题。

結果 (英文) 1:

The group of experts judged the measures in Japan than in the case of "relevant scientific evidence is insufficient" to take. Because of the controversial case Apple spread the risk of fire blight quarantine measures have been carried out more than 200 years of scientific research and practice test study, there are many high-quality evidence for fire blight through apple spread risk specific scientific problems.

結果 (英文) 2:

Expert group to determine the Japanese measures not in "relevant scientific evidence is insufficient to take the case".Because the case against fire blight with apple spread risk quarantine controversy, has been performed for more than 200 years of relevant scientific research and practice test research, there are many high quality the important evidence for fire blight by Apple transmission risk this particular scientific problem.

結果 (英文) 3:

Expert groups found Japan measures not in "case of insufficient relevant scientific evidence". Because this case provided for fire blight of Apple quarantine measures the risk of the spread of controversy, has been for more than 200 years of practice relevant to scientific research and study, has a large number of high quality transmission of important evidence for fire blight of Apple risks of this specific scientific questions.