When was the last time you updated your advertising copy, such as on A的繁體中文翻譯

When was the last time you updated

When was the last time you updated your advertising copy, such as on AdWords or Facebook ads? If you’re not updating your ads, your frequency — the number of times one person sees a specific ad — is likely going through the roof. A high frequency is typically not good in terms of return on overall ad spend.

To change ad copy, do not just pick a new headline and image out of thin air. Instead, take the data from the ads you have been running to make a better ad, or at least test versions of your current ads to improve performance.

In this article, I’ll describe a mechanism for writing better ads. I’ll address when to change ads and when to stop them. I’ll use Facebook ads as examples, as Facebook provides positive and negative feedback.

Ad Frequency

What is an acceptable ad frequency? This will vary slightly depending on your shoppers’ place in the funnel — i.e., first time vs. remarketing.

When it comes to people that haven’t visited your site before, aim for a frequency of no more than two. Some advertisers might call this too low and too difficult to achieve. But think about it this way: Say you have a 1 percent Facebook lookalike audience in the U.S. That’s 1.9 million people. It’s going to take a while to reach them all. Avoiding a frequency of two isn’t hard.

Now, for remarketing ads. This frequency can be higher, as these ads serve more of a reminder. I wouldn’t go above five, however. That’s because, for a remarketing audience, it’s less about the wow and more about the reminder. Additional reasons for a higher frequency for remarketing ads are as follows.

Smaller audiences. Remarketing audiences are typically smaller, especially if the audience is heavily segmented. Less people means more chances they’ll see an ad.
Lower cost. Remarketing ads are often cheaper. Depending on how much budget you allot to your remarketing campaign, you could overspend, and thus drive up the frequency.
Refreshing Ads

So how to refresh ads, to keep the frequencies low and the performance high? Unfortunately, with the Facebook ads platform, advertisers cannot test rotated ads. The system will automatically show the ads that preform the best.

Unlike AdWords, there is no “Rotate Evenly” option on Facebook, much to many an advertisers’ dismay. There is a workaround, however, but it doesn’t always work. You can launch two identical ad sets, and have a different ad in each. This means if you want to launch a new ad, you’ll likely have to pause and re-launch the existing ads you want to submit against.

Facebook’s Power Editor makes this easy, but it’s still a laborious process. Until Facebook offers greater control over ad rotation, however, this is how it’s done. As is, when you launch a set of ads, you’ll have to keep a close eye on what works, because the system will quickly choose. Then it’s on you to innovate and improve.

Testing Ad Copy

So how do you take your learnings from Facebook and improve? It can be tricky if winning ads get automatically chosen in just a few days or even hours, depending on your budget. It’s mostly a game of statistical significance.

For example, say we have two ads: one has spent $1,000 and has a cost per acquisition of $100. The other has spent $60, and has a CPA of $20. Which one do we pick? The ad with the CPA of $20, right? Wrong. Even though the CPA is $80 lower, the scale is drastically smaller, so those numbers can’t be trusted.

You’ll likely run into scenarios like this frequently, waiting for the results to be statistically significant. (I use a free tool from Visual Website Optimizer to check if the results are statistically adequate.) Once you get to significance, choose your winning ad. From there, change it, and run the changed version against the original. Do this repeatedly until you’re satisfied with the results — knowing you should always strive for improvements.
0/5000
原始語言: -
目標語言: -
結果 (繁體中文) 1: [復制]
復制成功!
When was the last time you updated your advertising copy, such as on AdWords or Facebook ads? If you’re not updating your ads, your frequency — the number of times one person sees a specific ad — is likely going through the roof. A high frequency is typically not good in terms of return on overall ad spend.To change ad copy, do not just pick a new headline and image out of thin air. Instead, take the data from the ads you have been running to make a better ad, or at least test versions of your current ads to improve performance.In this article, I’ll describe a mechanism for writing better ads. I’ll address when to change ads and when to stop them. I’ll use Facebook ads as examples, as Facebook provides positive and negative feedback.Ad FrequencyWhat is an acceptable ad frequency? This will vary slightly depending on your shoppers’ place in the funnel — i.e., first time vs. remarketing.When it comes to people that haven’t visited your site before, aim for a frequency of no more than two. Some advertisers might call this too low and too difficult to achieve. But think about it this way: Say you have a 1 percent Facebook lookalike audience in the U.S. That’s 1.9 million people. It’s going to take a while to reach them all. Avoiding a frequency of two isn’t hard.Now, for remarketing ads. This frequency can be higher, as these ads serve more of a reminder. I wouldn’t go above five, however. That’s because, for a remarketing audience, it’s less about the wow and more about the reminder. Additional reasons for a higher frequency for remarketing ads are as follows.
Smaller audiences. Remarketing audiences are typically smaller, especially if the audience is heavily segmented. Less people means more chances they’ll see an ad.
Lower cost. Remarketing ads are often cheaper. Depending on how much budget you allot to your remarketing campaign, you could overspend, and thus drive up the frequency.
Refreshing Ads

So how to refresh ads, to keep the frequencies low and the performance high? Unfortunately, with the Facebook ads platform, advertisers cannot test rotated ads. The system will automatically show the ads that preform the best.

Unlike AdWords, there is no “Rotate Evenly” option on Facebook, much to many an advertisers’ dismay. There is a workaround, however, but it doesn’t always work. You can launch two identical ad sets, and have a different ad in each. This means if you want to launch a new ad, you’ll likely have to pause and re-launch the existing ads you want to submit against.

Facebook’s Power Editor makes this easy, but it’s still a laborious process. Until Facebook offers greater control over ad rotation, however, this is how it’s done. As is, when you launch a set of ads, you’ll have to keep a close eye on what works, because the system will quickly choose. Then it’s on you to innovate and improve.

Testing Ad Copy

So how do you take your learnings from Facebook and improve? It can be tricky if winning ads get automatically chosen in just a few days or even hours, depending on your budget. It’s mostly a game of statistical significance.

For example, say we have two ads: one has spent $1,000 and has a cost per acquisition of $100. The other has spent $60, and has a CPA of $20. Which one do we pick? The ad with the CPA of $20, right? Wrong. Even though the CPA is $80 lower, the scale is drastically smaller, so those numbers can’t be trusted.

You’ll likely run into scenarios like this frequently, waiting for the results to be statistically significant. (I use a free tool from Visual Website Optimizer to check if the results are statistically adequate.) Once you get to significance, choose your winning ad. From there, change it, and run the changed version against the original. Do this repeatedly until you’re satisfied with the results — knowing you should always strive for improvements.
正在翻譯中..
結果 (繁體中文) 2:[復制]
復制成功!
當是你最後一次更新你的廣告文案,如AdWords或Facebook的廣告?如果你不更新您的廣告,頻率-一個人看到特定廣告的次數-很可能穿過屋頂。高頻率通常不是在整體廣告支出回報方面不錯的。要改變廣告文案,不要只選擇一個新的標題和圖片憑空。相反,採取從廣告你已經運行做出更好的廣告數據,或者你目前的廣告至少測試版本,以提高性能。在這篇文章中,我將介紹一種機制,寫出更好的廣告。我會解決的時候改變廣告以及何時停止他們。我將使用Facebook的廣告作為例子,Facebook提供正面和負面的反饋。廣告頻率什麼是可以接受的廣告頻率是多少?這將取決於你的購物者在漏斗的地方略有不同-即第一次與再營銷當涉及到以前從未訪問過您網站,目的是為不超 ​​過兩個的頻率。一些廣告客戶可能會調用這個太低了,太難以實現。不過想想這樣說:假設你有在美國這190萬人1%的Facebook相似受眾群體。這將需要一段時間才能達到他們。避免兩個頻率不辛苦。現在,再營銷廣告。該頻率可以更高,因為這些廣告為更多的一個提醒。我不會去上述五個,但是。這是因為,對於一個營銷受眾群體,這是少了WOW,更多的是提醒。都是為營銷廣告頻率更高的附加 ​​理由如下。小觀眾。營銷受眾群體通常是較小的,特別是如果觀眾是高度分割。少人意味著更多的機會,他們就會看到一則廣告。成本更低。再營銷的廣告往往是便宜。這取決於你有多少預算分配到你的營銷廣告系列,你可以亂花錢,從而推高頻率刷新廣告那麼如何刷新廣告,以保持較低的頻率和高性能?不幸的是,Facebook的廣告平台,廣告主無法測試旋轉廣告。系統會自動顯示瓶坯最好的廣告。不同於AdWords中,有在Facebook上沒有“旋轉均勻”選項,讓很多的廣告主感到沮喪。有一種解決方法,但是,但它並不總是工作。您可以啟動兩個相同的廣告組,並在每一個不同的廣告。這意味著如果你想推出一個新的廣告,你可能不得不暫停和重新啟動要提交對現有的廣告Facebook的電源編輯器,使這個容易,但它仍然是一個艱苦的過程。直到Facebook上提供超過廣告輪換更大的控制權,但是,這是它是如何做。由於是,當你推出一組廣告,你必須保持對什麼工作密切關注,因為系統會快速選擇。然後,它的你來創新和改進。測試廣告文案那麼,如何從Facebook把你的學習收穫和提高?它可能會非常棘手,如果獲勝的廣告獲得在短短的幾天甚至幾小時內自動選擇,取決於你的預算。這主要是統計意義的遊戲。例如,假設我們有兩個廣告:一個人花了1000 $,擁有每收購$ 100的成本。另花了$ 60並有$ 20註冊會計師。我們挑哪一個?用$ 20,對註冊會計師的廣告?錯誤。儘管註冊會計師為$ 80較低,規模較小的劇烈,所以這些數字是不可信任的。你可能會遇到這樣的情況頻繁,等待結果在統計學上顯著。(我用從Visual網站優化一個免費的工具來檢查,如果結果是統計學上足夠的。)一旦你得到的意義,選擇勝出的廣告。從那裡,改變它,並運行更改後的版本對原稿。知道你應該總是努力改進-直到你滿意的結果反复執行此操作。





























正在翻譯中..
結果 (繁體中文) 3:[復制]
復制成功!
你最後一次更新你的廣告文案時,如AdWords或臉譜網的廣告嗎?如果你不更新你的廣告,你的頻率-一個人看到一個特定的廣告的次數-很可能會通過屋頂。一個高的頻率通常是不好的整體廣告支出的回報。要改變廣告文案,不只是選擇一個新的標題和影像的薄空氣。相反,從你一直在運行的廣告的數據,以使一個更好的廣告,或至少測試版本的你現時的廣告,以提高效能。在這篇文章中,我將描述一個更好的廣告的機制。我會解决時,改變廣告和什麼時候停止他們。我將使用臉譜網的廣告作為例子,因為臉譜網提供了正面和負面的迴響。廣告頻率什麼是一個可以接受的廣告頻率?這將稍微取決於你的購物者在漏斗-即有所不同,第一次與行銷。當涉及到以前沒有訪問過你的網站的人,目標頻率不超過兩個。一些廣告主可能會稱之為太低,太難實現。但這樣想吧:你在美國有百分之1的觀眾是190萬人的臉譜網”。這將需要一段時間,以達到他們所有。避免兩個頻率是不難。現在,行銷廣告,這個頻率可以更高,因為這些廣告服務更多的提醒。然而,我不會超過五。這是因為,對於一個行銷的受眾,它少哇,更多的提醒。行銷廣告的頻率較高的一個額外的原因如下。小觀眾。再觀眾通常都比較小,特別是如果觀眾嚴重分割。更少的人意味著更多的機會,他們會看到一個廣告。低成本。行銷廣告往往比較便宜。取決於你的行銷預算分配給你的活動,你可能會超支,從而驅動頻率上升。清新的廣告那麼如何重繪廣告,保持頻率低和效能高呢?不幸的是,與臉譜網的廣告平臺,廣告主無法測試旋轉廣告。該系統將自動顯示的廣告,瓶坯的最佳。不像廣告,沒有“勻速旋轉”選項,在臉譜網,很多很多廣告主的沮喪。然而有一種變通方法,,但它並不總是工作。你可以推出兩個相同的廣告集,並在每個有不同的廣告。這意味著如果你想推出一個新的廣告,你很可能不得不暫停和重新啟動現有的廣告,你想提交。臉譜網的權力編輯器使這個容易,但它仍然是一個費力的過程。然而,直到臉譜網提供了更大的控制,廣告旋轉,這是如何做到的。正如是,當你推出一套廣告,你必須保持密切關注什麼作品,因為該系統將迅速選擇。然後它就在你的創新和改進。測試廣告文案所以你如何讓臉譜網自己的學習和提高?這可能是棘手的,如果贏得廣告自動選擇在短短幾天甚至幾個小時,這取決於你的預算。這主要是一個統計意義上的遊戲。例如,說我們有兩個廣告:一個已經花費了1000美元,並有一個100美元的收購成本。另一個已經花費了60美元,並有20美元的註冊會計師。我們選擇哪一個?註冊會計師的廣告為20美元,對嗎?錯誤。即使註冊會計師是80美元較低,規模大幅度較小,所以這些數位不能被信任。你可能會經常遇到這樣的情况,等待結果有統計學意義。(我使用一個免費的工具,從視覺網站優化,以檢查是否有統計學足够。)一旦你得到了意義,選擇你贏得的廣告。從那裡,改變它,並運行改變版本對原來的。這樣做反復,直到你對結果滿意-知道你應該總是努力改善。
正在翻譯中..
 
其它語言
本翻譯工具支援: 世界語, 中文, 丹麥文, 亞塞拜然文, 亞美尼亞文, 伊博文, 俄文, 保加利亞文, 信德文, 偵測語言, 優魯巴文, 克林貢語, 克羅埃西亞文, 冰島文, 加泰羅尼亞文, 加里西亞文, 匈牙利文, 南非柯薩文, 南非祖魯文, 卡納達文, 印尼巽他文, 印尼文, 印度古哈拉地文, 印度文, 吉爾吉斯文, 哈薩克文, 喬治亞文, 土庫曼文, 土耳其文, 塔吉克文, 塞爾維亞文, 夏威夷文, 奇切瓦文, 威爾斯文, 孟加拉文, 宿霧文, 寮文, 尼泊爾文, 巴斯克文, 布爾文, 希伯來文, 希臘文, 帕施圖文, 庫德文, 弗利然文, 德文, 意第緒文, 愛沙尼亞文, 愛爾蘭文, 拉丁文, 拉脫維亞文, 挪威文, 捷克文, 斯洛伐克文, 斯洛維尼亞文, 斯瓦希里文, 旁遮普文, 日文, 歐利亞文 (奧里雅文), 毛利文, 法文, 波士尼亞文, 波斯文, 波蘭文, 泰文, 泰盧固文, 泰米爾文, 海地克里奧文, 烏克蘭文, 烏爾都文, 烏茲別克文, 爪哇文, 瑞典文, 瑟索托文, 白俄羅斯文, 盧安達文, 盧森堡文, 科西嘉文, 立陶宛文, 索馬里文, 紹納文, 維吾爾文, 緬甸文, 繁體中文, 羅馬尼亞文, 義大利文, 芬蘭文, 苗文, 英文, 荷蘭文, 菲律賓文, 葡萄牙文, 蒙古文, 薩摩亞文, 蘇格蘭的蓋爾文, 西班牙文, 豪沙文, 越南文, 錫蘭文, 阿姆哈拉文, 阿拉伯文, 阿爾巴尼亞文, 韃靼文, 韓文, 馬來文, 馬其頓文, 馬拉加斯文, 馬拉地文, 馬拉雅拉姆文, 馬耳他文, 高棉文, 等語言的翻譯.

Copyright ©2025 I Love Translation. All reserved.

E-mail: