By implementing a comprehensive pro

By implementing a comprehensive proactive safety analysis approach, agencies will likely identify more
potential safety projects than they can fund and deliver. It will be important for an agency to prioritize
their projects internally before funding is sought. It is not uncommon for projects to have a B/C ratio as
low as 0.1 or as high as 100. Once the relative cost effectiveness of an agency’s potential projects has
been established, the projects with low to mid‐ranged B/C ratios should be reassessed. Projects with
very low initial B/C ratios may be dropped while projects with low to mid ranged B/C ratios may be
redefined by changing the limits of the proposed improvements to focus on higher crash locations or
incorporating lower‐cost countermeasures. This reiterative process is illustrated in Figure 1 in Section 1
of this document.

結果 (中文) 1:

通过实施一种全面的主动预防性安全分析方法，机构有可能将确定更多潜在的安全项目，比他们可以资助并实施。它将是重要的机构，以确定优先次序他们内部之前寻求资金的项目。它不是常见的项目，以有作为的 B/C 比低至 0.1 或高达 100。一旦相对成本效益的机构潜在的项目建立了与 mid‐ranged B/C 比值低的项目应重新予以评估。项目非常低初始的 B/C 比可能会下降，而中期远程 B/C 比值低的项目可能会重新定义了通过改变拟议的改善措施，把重点放在更高的坠机地点的限制或结合 lower‐cost 对策。这个反复的过程如图 1 第 1 节中所示这份文件。

結果 (中文) 3:

通过全面的主动安全性分析的方法实现，机构可能会发现更多的
潜在安全项目比他们可以基金和交付。它将一个机构的优先
项目寻求资金内部之前是重要的。对项目有一个B / C比为
低0.1到高达100，这是不寻常的。一旦一个机构的潜在项目的相对成本效益的有
被建立，低的项目中‐为B / C比应重新评估。与
非常低的初始B / C比的项目可能会下降而项目低中档B / C比率可
改变的改善建议关注高坠毁地点或
极限的定义包含低‐成本对策。在本文档的1节
1数字说明这个反复的过程。