為何證人會講出從未發生過的事？如果這些指控並非蓄意汙衊，那麼，造成誤判

為何證人會講出從未發生過的事？如果這些指控並非蓄意汙衊，那麼，造成誤判的最大可能就在於：證人的記憶是錯的，但法官卻採信錯的證詞，做出錯的判決。或許，每個人都有健忘的時候，對某些發生過的事失去印象是正常的，但很顯然，印象模糊並不會成為影響判決的關鍵。

結果 (英文) 1:

Why witness speaks out things that never happened? If these allegations are not deliberately slander, then caused a miscarriage of justice is that the maximum possible: the witness's memory is wrong, but the judge has taken the testimony of the letter wrong, make the wrong decision.

Perhaps everyone has the time forgetful, lose some impression of what happened is normal, but it is clear that vague impression and will not affect the key decisions.

結果 (英文) 2:

Why did the witness tell something that never happened? If these allegations are not deliberate lying, then the greatest possibility of misjudgment is that the witness's memory is wrong, but the judge accepts the wrong testimony and makes the wrong decision.

Perhaps it is normal for everyone to lose an impression of something that has happened, but it is clear that blurring the impression is not the key to influencing the verdict.

結果 (英文) 3:

Why does the witness say something that never happened? If the accusations are not deliberately defamatory, the most likely cause of miscarriage of justice lies in that the memory of the witness is wrong, but the judge takes the wrong testimony and makes the wrong judgment.
Perhaps, when everyone has forgetfulness, it's normal to lose the impression of something that happened, but obviously, vague impression will not be the key to affect the judgment.