比喻、事實或象徵？--宗教語言的問題(神聖的根源ch.12-14)1.

比喻、事實或象徵？--宗教語言的問題(神聖的根源ch.12-14)1.宗教的比喻：(1).K. Popper：證實vs.證偽(2)A. Flew：探險者之喻(3)R. Hare：怪人之喻(4)B. Mitchell：陌生人之喻(5)J. Hick：旅行者之喻(6)死後方能證實？2.關於宗教語言：(1)宗教語言的特質(2)宗教詮釋的特質(3)上帝存有的特質：宇宙存有vs.上帝的存有3.結語--齊克果：理性的思辨與信心的跳躍

結果 (英文) 1:

Metaphor, or symbolic facts? - religious language
(sacred roots of ch.12-14)
1. religious metaphor:
(1) .K Popper: vs. confirmed falsification.
(2) A Flew: Explorers metaphor.
(3) R . Hare: Frankenstein metaphor
(4) B Mitchell:. stranger metaphor
. (5) J Hick: Yu Travelodge
(6) after the death before being confirmed?
2. With regard to religious language:
(1) nature of religious language
(2) the characteristics of religious interpretation
(3) there are qualities of God: God vs. the universe there exists a
3. Conclusion - Kierkegaard: rational thought confidence and jump

結果 (英文) 2:

A metaphor, fact, or symbol? -- The problem of religious language
(Sacred Roots ch.12-14)
1. Religious metaphors:
(1). K. Popper: Confirmvs. False
(2) A. Flew: A Metaphor for Explorers
(3) R. Hare: A Strange Metaphor
(4) B. Mitchell: A Stranger
(5) J. Hick: A Traveler's Metaphor
(6) Can you confirm it after death?
2. With regard to religious language:
(1) The characteristics of religious language
(2) The characteristics of religious interpretation
(3) The Nature of God's Being: Cosmic Existence vs. God's Being
3. Conclusion-Zikgo: The Leap of Rational Thinking and Confidence

結果 (英文) 3:

A metaphor, fact, or symbol? --The problem of religious language
(Holy root ch.12-14)
1. Religious metaphor:
(1) K. Popper: verification vs. falsification
(2) A. flew: metaphor of explorers
(3) r. hare: the metaphor of the eccentric
(4) B. Mitchell: metaphor of strangers
(5) J. hick: the metaphor of travelers
(6) can it be confirmed after death?
2. Religious language:
(1) characteristics of religious language
(2) characteristics of religious interpretation
(3) the nature of God's being: cosmic being vs. God's being
3. Conclusion -- qikeguo: rational speculation and leap of confidence