讨论非常激烈，据统计，有百分之60的学生赞成，因为他们觉得面试可以全面

讨论非常激烈，据统计，有百分之60的学生赞成，因为他们觉得面试可以全面综合的评价一个学生和鼓励学生发展个性和特长，还有他们觉得一种开放和更有效的录取方式，是社会所需要的；但百分之40的学生反对，因为他们认为面试带有主观性，片面性，可能不公。并不是所有学生都擅长面试，还有就是他们认为一个人的全部不可能在3之5分钟内就全部了解。而我认为每个人都有所擅长的事，所以建议开设两种方式来供他们选择，以分配不同的工作，这样效率会有所提高。

結果 (英文) 1:

Very intense discussions, according to statistics, 60 percent of students in favor, because they feel that the interview can be a full and comprehensive evaluation of students and to encourage students to develop their personality and expertise, as well as they think that an open and more effective admission social needs; 40% of the students against, because they believe that the interview with the subjective, one-sidedness, may be unfair. Not all students are good at the interview, they believe there is a impossible to understand all within five minutes. And I think everyone has a good thing, it is proposed to set up two ways for them to choose,To assign different tasks, so that efficiency will be increased.

結果 (英文) 2:

Intense discussions, according to statistics, sixty percent of the students, because they feel that the interview can be a comprehensive evaluation of a student and encourage students to develop personality and strength, and they feel an open and more effective way of admission, is a social need; but forty percent of the students are against, because they think the interview with subjectivity, one-sidedness, perhaps unfair.Not all students are good at the interview, and they think that a person's all could not in 3 of the 5 minutes it was all about.And I think everyone is good at something, so that opened in two ways to choose,To assign a different job, so efficiency will be improved.

結果 (英文) 3:

Very intense discussion, according to the statistics, there were 60 per cent of students in favour, because they feel that the interview can be a comprehensive evaluation of a student and encourage students ' development of individuality and expertise, and they felt that a more open and effective form of taking, is needed; but 40 per cent of students against, because they believe that interviews with subjective and one-sided, may be unfair. Not all students are good at interviewing, there is all they think one impossible in 3 of 5 minutes we all know. And I believe that everyone is good at something, it is recommended that the introduction of two ways for them to choose,To assign a different work, such efficiency will be increased.