In the appeal, Japan only entangled in some literal meaning, such as "relevant scientific evidence is insufficient" scientific uncertainty "and so on, and did not propose substantive rebuttal and, therefore, the Appellate Body rejected .
In the appeal, Japan only in some literal entanglement, such as "scientific evidence", "scientific uncertainty." and so on, did not make substantial objection, so are the Appellate Body rejected.
In appeal, Japan only literally entangled in, such as "insufficient relevant scientific evidence" and "scientific uncertainty", and so on, does not provide a substantive rebuttal, also was rejected by the appellate body.