adding oxygen to the cells.... your

adding oxygen to the cells.... your lungs do that already, and there are a number of things that can't be cured simply by increasing blood oxygen levels, pretty much everything. if it claims to cure "everything" than clearly its violating FDA regulations that require such claims to be backed up by evidence. if it makes vague claims like "supporting health" in one way or another its advertising in a way to avoid FDA regulation.

anecdotal evidence is essentially worthless, the person claiming "it cured me" has no way of knowing weather or not the product actually effected their condition, or if it's simply a case of taking the product while they were getting treated, or getting better on their own anyway. that's why its not recognized as evidence.

bottom line is that your wasting money on fancy water drops.

alternative medicines can be dangerous, especially when used as a replacement. there's no regulations, no requirements to list possible side effects, or anything like that. if you have a problem go to a real medical doctor, don't look for the product that is cheapest or make the most pie in the sky claims, go with the product that has been demonstrated to work in a scientific way.

結果 (中文) 1:

将氧气添加到细胞......你的肺不是已经，并有大量的东西，不能简单地通过增加血液含氧量，几乎一切治愈。如果它声称治愈"一切"比清楚其违反 FDA 规则，这需要此类索赔的证据备份。如果它使模糊索赔像"支持健康"中的一种方法或另一个其广告的方式以避免 FDA 的规定。传闻证据是本质上毫无价值，声称"它治好了我"也没有办法知道天气或不是的产品实际上影响他们的状况，或如果，它只是考虑产品同时他们得到治疗，或相处的更好他们自己无论如何的人。这就是为什么它不认可作为证据。底线是你花式水的浪费钱滴眼液。替代药物可以是危险的尤其是当使用作为替换。有是没有规则，没有要求到列表中可能产生的副作用，或任何像那样。如果你有去看医生真正的医疗问题，不要寻找的是最便宜的产品或使天空索赔中的多数派，搭配的产品，已经被证实可以以科学的方式工作。

結果 (中文) 3:

向细胞中加入氧…你的肺已经做了，有很多的事情，不能简单地通过增加血液氧含量，相当多的一切。如果它声称治愈“一切”显然它违反了食品药品管理局规定，要求这些声称要得到证据的支持。如果它使模糊所声称的“支持”在某一方面或另一个广告在一个方式，以避免美国FDA的监管。

传闻证据本质上是没有价值的，人声称“治愈我“有没有办法知道天气或不是产品实际上影响他们的条件，或如果它的简单的情况下，服用该产品，而他们得到治疗，健康不管怎样还是越来越好。这就是为什么它没有被确认为证据。”。替代药物可能是危险的，特别是当用作替代品。没有规定，没有要求列出可能的副作用，或任何类似的。如果你有问题去真正的医生，不要寻找最便宜的产品，或者是在天空中做的最多的馅饼，去用以科学的方式工作的产品。