在科技的蓬勃發展下，GNSS被大眾所熟知，且廣泛地應用在各種領域上，也

在科技的蓬勃發展下，GNSS被大眾所熟知，且廣泛地應用在各種領域上，也成為我們主要測量和定位的方法，但是，為了處理GNSS觀測資料所使用的這些軟體，必須花費金錢添購或大量時間學習。隨著網際網路的發展及GNSS定位技術和資料處理技術的進步，國外成功結合精密單點定位技術及線上GNSS資料處理服務，讓使用者利用單一台GPS雙頻接收機的觀測數據，在全球任意位置不受區域和資料處理專業性的限制，將GNSS觀測資料收集後上傳處理系統，即可得到即時或後處理的高精度定位結果。本研究透過國際上不同單位所提供的免費線上GNSS處理服務，進行新竹及桃園兩個IGS國際追蹤站觀測資料的解算，進而分析不同服務在精密單點計算上的精度，以提供使用者參考。本文中分別針對動、靜態不同計算模式下，進行線上GNSS處理系統在平面及高程的精度比較。依據本實驗成果表明：平面精度的表現，動態模式下以CSRS精度較佳、靜態模式則以APPS精度較佳；高程精度的表現，動態模式下以CSRS精度較佳、靜態模式則以MagicGNSS精度較佳。

結果 (英文) 1:

Under the vigorous development of technology, GNSS is known to the public, and widely used in various fields, has become the main way we measure and positioning, however, in order to deal with these software GNSS observations used, have to spend money to purchase the or a lot of time to learn. With the development of GNSS positioning technology and data processing technology and the Internet, combined with the success of foreign Precise Point Positioning GNSS technology and online data processing services to the observation data users with a single dual-frequency GPS receiver units, in anywhere in the world without geographic limitations and data processing professional, the GNSS observation data collection after uploading processing system, you can get real-time or post-processing of high-precision positioning result.
In this study, through free online GNSS processing services provided by different units internationally, Hsinchu and Taoyuan be solving two international IGS tracking station observation data, and then analyze the accuracy of different services on the precise point calculations, in order to provide users with reference . Herein, respectively, for dynamic and static different calculation mode, for online processing system compare the accuracy of GNSS plane and elevation. According to the experiment results show: the performance of the plane accuracy, dynamic accuracy CSRS preferred mode, static mode places preferred APPS accuracy; the height accuracy of performance, accuracy dynamic CSRS preferred mode, static mode places more accuracy MagicGNSS good.

結果 (英文) 2:

With the development of technology, GNSS is well known to the public and widely used in a variety of fields, which has become our primary method of measurement and positioning, but in order to process the gnSS observation data used in these software, it is necessary to spend money or a lot of time to learn. With the development of the Internet and the progress of GNSS positioning technology and data processing technology, foreign successful combination of precision single point positioning technology and online GNSS data processing services, allowing users to use a single GPS dual-frequency receiver observation data, any location in the world is not limited by regional and data processing professionalism, The high-precision positioning results of real-time or post-processing can be obtained by uploading the processing system after the GNSS observation data is collected.
Through the free online GNSS processing service provided by different international units, this study is used to solve the observation data of two IGS international tracking stations in Hsinchu and Taoyuan, and then analyze the accuracy of different services in precision single point computing to provide user reference. In this paper, the accuracy of the online GNSS processing system in plane and elevation is compared in different calculation modes of dynamic and static. According to the results of this experiment, the performance of plane accuracy is better in dynamic mode with CSRS precision and static mode is better in APPS accuracy, and the performance of elevation accuracy is better in dynamic mode, the accuracy of CSRS in dynamic mode is better and the static mode is better in MagicGNSS. ...

結果 (英文) 3:

With the rapid development of science and technology, GNSS is well known by the public and widely used in various fields. It has also become our main measurement and positioning method. However, in order to deal with these software used in GNSS observation data, we must spend money or a lot of time to learn. With the development of Internet and the progress of GNSS positioning technology and data processing technology, foreign countries have successfully combined the precise single point positioning technology and online GNSS data processing service, so that users can use the observation data of a single GPS dual frequency receiver to collect and upload the GNSS observation data to the processing system at any position in the world without the limitation of regional and data processing specialty Real time or post-processing high-precision positioning results.
Through the free online GNSS processing services provided by different units in the world, this study calculates the observation data of two IGS international tracking stations in Hsinchu and Taoyuan, and then analyzes the precision of different services in precise single point calculation, so as to provide users with reference. In this paper, according to the dynamic and static calculation modes, the accuracy of GNSS processing system in plane and elevation is compared. According to the results of this experiment, the performance of plane precision is better in dynamic mode with better precision in CSRs, in static mode with better precision in APS, in elevation precision with better precision in dynamic mode with better precision in CSRs and in static mode with better precision in magicgnss.