Aristotle thought that time is intrinsically connected tochange. “[He] argued that time should not be identified withchange, since change can be fast or slow, but it makes nosense to say that time is fast or slow…time would not existwithout change, he argues, since if nothing were perceived tohave changed then we would not notice that time hadpassed.” (437)• But what is wrong with this picture? Is there any otherreason to think that change is essential to time?