近年來，無論是在破壞性地震後還是在預期地震中，為改善抗震性能而加固的建

近年來，無論是在破壞性地震後還是在預期地震中，為改善抗震性能而加固的建築物都有了顯著的新增。許多結構工程師在其職業生涯的大部分時間都在設計新的建築物，他們可能發現自己還沒有完全準備好應對地震加固現有建築物以提高抗震能力的挑戰。本文/海報旨在簡要總結各種加固方法的基本優缺點、設計指導和參攷。在抗震加固方面有豐富經驗的工程師會發現本文相當初級，但作者認為許多工程師需要這一基本指導。地震加固方案的選擇取決於許多因素。該方案必須糾正現有建築抗震體系和新加固構件中已發現的缺陷必須在結構上與現有結構系統不相容。它必須在功能上，有時在美學上與現有建築相容和互補。在歷史建築中，附加元素的設定必須考慮到保存歷史結構和歷史氛圍。該計畫必須符合業主的績效目標，無論是生命安全、重要設施還是某種形式的有限警報，以便在地震後迅速恢復全面運營。如果建築物在加固工作期間仍被佔用，在選擇適當的加固解決方案時，最大限度地减少對佔用者的干擾可能成為首要問題。在有人居住的建築物中，通常最令人滿意的做法是在建築物周邊進行加固，大部分工作是從外部完成的。

結果 (英文) 1:

In recent years, both in the devastating earthquake or earthquake expected in order to improve the seismic performance of buildings and has a significant strengthening of the new. Many structural engineer most of his career in the design of new buildings, they may find themselves not fully prepared to deal with seismic reinforcement of existing buildings in order to improve the seismic capacity of challenges. Paper / poster to give a brief summary of the basic advantages and disadvantages of various methods of reinforcement, guidance and reference designs. Has extensive experience in seismic retrofit engineers will find this article quite elementary, but the authors believe that many engineers need this basic guidance.
Selection of Its earthquake depends on many factors. The program must correct the defects of existing buildings and the new system of seismic reinforcement member has been found
to be incompatible with the existing structure of the system in the structure. It must sometimes be compatible and complementary in function and aesthetics on the existing buildings. In the historic building, set additional elements must take into account the preservation of historical structures and historic atmosphere. The plan must conform to the owners of performance targets, whether it is life safety, important facilities are still limited in some form of alert in order to quickly resume full operations after the earthquake. If the building is still occupied during the consolidation work, in the selection of appropriate reinforcement solutions that minimize interference with the occupants could become the most important issue. In a building inhabited usually the most satisfying approach is to be reinforced in the surrounding buildings, most of the work is done from the outside.

結果 (英文) 2:

In recent years, both after the devastating earthquake and in the expected earthquake, the buildings reinforced to improve seismic performance have been significantly added. Many structural engineers have spent most of their careers designing new buildings, and they may find themselves not fully prepared for the challenge of seismically reinforcing existing buildings to improve earthquake resistance. This article/poster is intended to briefly summarize the basic strengths and weaknesses of various reinforcement methods, design guidance and reference. Engineers with extensive experience in seismic reinforcement will find this paper quite rudimentary, but the authors believe that many mission planners need this basic guidance.
The choice of seismic reinforcement scheme depends on many factors. The programme must correct the deficiencies found in existing building seismic systems and new reinforced components
The existing structural system must be structurally incompatible. It must be functionally and sometimes aesthetically compatible and complementary to existing buildings. In historical buildings, the setting of additional elements must take into account the preservation of historical structure and historical atmosphere. The program must meet the owner's performance goals, whether it's life safety, critical facilities, or some form of limited alert to get full operation back up and running quickly after an earthquake. If the building is still occupied during reinforcement work, minimizing interference with the occupants can be a primary issue when choosing the appropriate reinforcement solution. In inhabited buildings, it is usually most satisfying to reinforce the perimeter of the building, and most of the work is done from the outside.

結果 (英文) 3:

In recent years, no matter after the destructive earthquake or in the expected earthquake, the buildings strengthened to improve the seismic performance have increased significantly. Many structural engineers spend most of their careers designing new buildings, and they may find that they are not fully prepared for the challenge of strengthening existing buildings to improve their seismic capacity. The purpose of this paper / poster is to briefly summarize the basic advantages and disadvantages, design guidance and reference of various reinforcement methods. Engineers with rich experience in seismic reinforcement will find that this paper is quite preliminary, but the author believes that many engineers need this basic guidance.
The choice of seismic strengthening scheme depends on many factors. The scheme must correct the defects found in the existing seismic system and new reinforced members
Must be structurally incompatible with existing structural systems. It must be compatible and complementary with existing buildings in function and sometimes aesthetics. In historical buildings, the setting of additional elements must take into account the preservation of historical structure and historical atmosphere. The project must meet the owner's performance objectives, whether life safety, critical facilities or some form of limited alarm, in order to quickly resume full operation after the earthquake. If the building is still occupied during the reinforcement work, it may be the first problem to minimize the interference to the occupier when choosing the appropriate reinforcement solution. In residential buildings, usually the most satisfactory way is to reinforce around the building, most of the work is done from the outside.