GC/TCD Analysis of A Natural Gas
Sample on A Single HP-PLOT Q Column
Author
Zhenghua Ji
Agilent Technologies
2850 Centerville Road
Wilmington, DE 19808
Key Word
GC/TCD
Natural gas
PLOT Q column
Abstract
An Agilent 6890 series gas chromatograph (GC) equipped with a TCD
(thermal conductivity detector) was
used with and HP-PLOT Q capillary
column for the analysis of a natural
gas sample. Over 70 sequential runs
showed good separation for a wide
variety of analytes with good method
reproducibility.
Introduction
Natural gas is an important energy
source and widely used as a starting
material for many chemical processes. It contains mainly methane and
different levels of other hydrocarbons and fixed gases such as nitrogen, helium, and carbon dioxide.
Hydrocarbons heavier than C7 are
usually present at ppm levels.
Hydrogen sulfide and other sulfur
compounds may be present, either
naturally or as added odorants.
Additional components may include
polar compounds, such as low levels
of water, and small amounts of
methanol and/or glycol which may
have been added for processing purposes [1,2]. Natural gases from different sources usually have the same
composition but different concentration levels.
In GC analyses, the variety of components in natural gas requires the
separation of both polar/non-polar
compounds. Multi-dimensional GC is
often required since no single column
can separate this wide variety of
natural gas constituents. Nor can a
single detector detect all compounds
satisfactorily. Specifically, the separation of fixed gases and water from
hydrocarbons is very difficult to
obtain on most wall-coated opentubular (WCOT) columns; and TCD
has a limited sensitivity for trace
level compounds and odorant
compounds.
Multi-dimensional GC coupled with
switching valves requires the use of
several different types of PLOT
columns [2-4]. The HP-PLOT Al2O3
column [3-4] is often used for
hydrocarbon separations and the
determination of BTUs. The HPPLOT MoleSieve column is used for
the separation of fixed gases such as
oxygen, nitrogen and helium, and
even argon, [3-4] from methane. And
the separation of polar and active
compound—such as water, CO2, and
odorants—is obtained using a porous
polymer PLOT column, mostly Q
type [3].
All three columns are connected by
one or more multiple port valves and
the complete separation is obtained
by time switching eluents to each
column and detector. Backflushing
hydrocarbon compounds heavier
than C
7 is necessary in most cases.
Clearly the column interchange
and connection as well as the valve
and time switching make this a
difficult technique to use for routine
analyses.
The ideal approach would be onedimensional GC. Natural gas analysis
using two parallel connected PLOT
columns has been done with the successful separation of hydrocarbons
and oxygen and nitrogen [4].
However, this method is limited
because the separation of polar compounds from hydrocarbons cannot be
Application Note
228-387
2
prolongs the analysis time for hydrocarbons heavier than C
7 and/or
requires backflushing of the hydrocarbons. The limited resolution of
nitrogen/air from methane requires
low starting temperatures (@ 40°C)
which increases analysis time and
affects the accuracy of the analysis.
Since a fraction of the nitrogen,
carbon dioxide, and methane peaks
overlap, the concentration of methane
will be incorrectly quantified.
New HP PLOT-Q columns overcome
some of these problems making them
suitable for natural gas analyses. This
application note examines a simple
GC/TCD mehtod for the analysis of
natural gas using a new HP porous
polymer, Q-type, PLOT column. The
resolution of nitrogen and carbon
dioxide from methane on different
commercially available PLOT
columns is compared and reproducibility and reliability are evaluated.
Experimental
Gas chromatography analysis of a
natural gas sample was done using an
Agilent 6890 series gas chromatograph (GC) with electronic pneumatics control (EPC) and a Thermal
Conductivity Detector (TCD). For
conventional gas analysis, a six-port
valve with an 0.25 cc sampling loop
was used to introduce natural gas
sample onto the HP-PLOT Q column
in split mode (split ratio 18:1). The
GC parameters are listed in Table 1.
A natural gas sample supplied by
Scott Specialty Gases, Inc,
(Plumsteadville, PA) was used and
the original compounds and concentrations are listed in Table 2. This
sample was modified by adding
methanol, water, and hydrogen
sulfide. During analysis, the possible
leaking of some air in the sampling
loop may also have caused some
change in concentrations.
Analyses were run using an HP-PLOT
Q porous polymer column (part numachieved on these two kinds of PLOT
columns. Additionally, water, CO2,
and odorants deactivate Al
2O3 and
molesieve PLOT column coatings.
Therefore, these interactions cause
shifting of retention times thereby
affecting the repeatability, reliability,
and accuracy of the natural gas
analysis.
Porous polymer, Q-type PLOT
columns combine the separation features of the Al
2O3 PLOT and molesieve PLOT columns when separating
features of the Al
2O3 PLOT and molesieve PLOT columns when separating
alkanes and fixed gases. The PLOT-Q
coating overcomes the reproducibility
problem caused by polar compounds
deactivating Al2O3 and molesieve
absorbent coatings in natural gas
samples.
Additionally, PLOT-Q columns can
separate CO2, water, and odorants
from an alkanes matrix. Thus, the
analysis of natural gas on PLOT-Q
columns will satisfy most the separation requirements from BTUs through
hydrocarbon components and polar
compound determinations.
However, there are also some problems associated with the use of PLOTQ columns for natural gas analysis.
Fixed gas (such as air, CO, and noble
gases) cannot be separated on PLOTQ columns at above ambient temperatures. The upper temperature limits
are usually low (250°C) for most commercial PLOT-Q columns.
For some commercial PLOT-Q
columns, loose particle binding in the
coating, high column bleed, and the
limited resolution of nitrogen/air from
methane are major problems restricting their usefulness in natural gas
analyses. Loose particle binding in
the coating causes baseline spiking
when the sampling valve is operated
or fast temperature ramping is used.
High column bleed makes these
columns useful only at temperatures
below 250°C and this situation
GC 6890 GC with EPC
Columns 0.53 mm x 30 m PLOT-Q columns
Carrier Helium 8.6 ml/min @ 60°C, Constant flow mode
Oven 60°C (2 min) 30°C/min to 240°C (1 min)
Injection Split mode, 250°C, 0.25 cc sampling loope
Split flow 150 ml/min
Valve Valco 6-port valve, 0.25 cc sampling loop
Detector TCD
Reference flow Helium, 30 ml/min
Auxilary gas flow Helium, 3 ml/min
Table 1. GC Experimental Conditions
Compound Concentration (v/v%)
Nitrogen 2.500
Methane 88.660
Carbon Dioxide 3.000
Ethane 3.520
Propane 1.050
iso-Butane 0.400
n-Butane 0.400
neo-Pentane 0.100
iso-Pentane 0.150
n-Pentane 0.150
Hexane 0.050
Heptane 0.020
Table 2. Natural Gas Sample
ber 19095P-QO4) with two other
brands (X and Y) of Q-type PLOT
columns used for resolution comparisons. All columns were conditioned
at 250°C overnight per manufacturer
recommendation to reduce column
bleed.
3
Results and Discussions
HP-PLOT Q type columns are coated
with porous polymer particles made
of divinylbenzene and ethylvinylbenzene and can separate hydrocarbons
up to C14 as well as some polar compounds. Their upper isothermal and
programming temperature limits are
270°C and 290°C, respectively.
The separation of the constitutents in
the natural gas sample was done
using a porous polymer HP-PLOT Q
column as shown in Figure 1. The
analysis time for this run was 9 minutes. Hydrogen sulfide, water, and
methanol were well-separated from
ethane, propane and iso-butane.
Although baseline spiking is commonly associated with this analysis
for some commercially available
columns, no baseline spiking was
observed with the HP-PLOT Q
column, indicating that the stationary
phase of this PLOT column provides
excellent immobilization that can
withstand: fast oven temperature
ramping (30°C/min), a pressure
pulse generated from valve actuation, and carrier gas pressure ramping at constant flow mode. Resultant
column bleed was very low.
Limited resolution of nitrogen and
carbon dixoide from methane is
obtained using most commercial
PLOT-Q columns. To evaluate the resolution of the new HP-PLOT Q column (Figure 1), an HP-PLOT Q column and two other brands of PLOT-Q
columns (brand X brand Y) were
compared. All columns were 0.53 mm
internal diameter. The natural gas
sample size was 0.25 cc with a split
ratio of 18:1. Peak resolutions (Rs)
were calculated based on the formulae in (1) and the results listed in
Table 3.
• Where t
a and tb are the
retention times of peaks A
and B
• W
a(1/2) and Wb(1/2) are their
peak widths at half height,
respectively.
Peak resolution for N
2-air/methane
using the HP-PLOT Q column was
greater than 1.5 which is the conventional requirement for base line
separation, even at a 60°C initial
oven temperature. The resolution of
carbon dioxide from methane at
60°C on the HP-PLOT Q column is
40% higher than the same resolution
on the other two brands of PLOT-Q
columns tested. This separation
capability of the HP-PLOT Q column
also can sufficiently resolve nitrogen
and carbon dioxide from methane,
even if the methane peak is tailing
due to sample overload. The starting
temperature of 60°C also results in a
30% reduction in GC cycle time.
One of the concerns associated with
using PLOT columns for natural gas
analysis is reproducibility. It is well
known that — when using alumina
PLOT and molesieve PLOT columns
— the retention times for hydrocarbons shift due to deactivation of
R
s (A/B) =
2* (tb- ta)
1.7* (Wa(1/2)+Wb(1/2)
0 2 4 6 8 min
Methane
N
2-Air
CO
2
Figure 1. Separation of Natural Gas
Ethane
H
2S
H
2O
C3
Methanol
i-C4
n-C4
neo-C5
i-C5
n-C5
C6
C7
Column: 0.53 mm x 30 m, HP-PLOT Q
Carrier: Helium (8.6 ml/min @ 60°C)
Oven: 60°C (
GC/TCD Analysis of A Natural GasSample on A Single HP-PLOT Q ColumnAuthorZhenghua JiAgilent Technologies2850 Centerville RoadWilmington, DE 19808Key WordGC/TCDNatural gasPLOT Q columnAbstractAn Agilent 6890 series gas chromatograph (GC) equipped with a TCD(thermal conductivity detector) wasused with and HP-PLOT Q capillarycolumn for the analysis of a naturalgas sample. Over 70 sequential runsshowed good separation for a widevariety of analytes with good methodreproducibility.IntroductionNatural gas is an important energysource and widely used as a startingmaterial for many chemical processes. It contains mainly methane anddifferent levels of other hydrocarbons and fixed gases such as nitrogen, helium, and carbon dioxide.Hydrocarbons heavier than C7 areusually present at ppm levels.Hydrogen sulfide and other sulfurcompounds may be present, eithernaturally or as added odorants.Additional components may includepolar compounds, such as low levelsof water, and small amounts ofmethanol and/or glycol which mayhave been added for processing purposes [1,2]. Natural gases from different sources usually have the samecomposition but different concentration levels.In GC analyses, the variety of components in natural gas requires theseparation of both polar/non-polarcompounds. Multi-dimensional GC isoften required since no single columncan separate this wide variety ofnatural gas constituents. Nor can asingle detector detect all compoundssatisfactorily. Specifically, the separation of fixed gases and water fromhydrocarbons is very difficult toobtain on most wall-coated opentubular (WCOT) columns; and TCDhas a limited sensitivity for tracelevel compounds and odorantcompounds.Multi-dimensional GC coupled withswitching valves requires the use ofseveral different types of PLOTcolumns [2-4]. The HP-PLOT Al2O3column [3-4] is often used forhydrocarbon separations and thedetermination of BTUs. The HPPLOT MoleSieve column is used forthe separation of fixed gases such asoxygen, nitrogen and helium, andeven argon, [3-4] from methane. Andthe separation of polar and activecompound—such as water, CO2, andodorants—is obtained using a porouspolymer PLOT column, mostly Qtype [3].All three columns are connected byone or more multiple port valves andthe complete separation is obtainedby time switching eluents to eachcolumn and detector. Backflushinghydrocarbon compounds heavierthan C7 is necessary in most cases.Clearly the column interchangeand connection as well as the valveand time switching make this adifficult technique to use for routineanalyses.The ideal approach would be onedimensional GC. Natural gas analysisusing two parallel connected PLOTcolumns has been done with the successful separation of hydrocarbonsand oxygen and nitrogen [4].However, this method is limitedbecause the separation of polar compounds from hydrocarbons cannot beApplication Note228-3872prolongs the analysis time for hydrocarbons heavier than C7 and/orrequires backflushing of the hydrocarbons. The limited resolution ofnitrogen/air from methane requireslow starting temperatures (@ 40°C)which increases analysis time andaffects the accuracy of the analysis.Since a fraction of the nitrogen,carbon dioxide, and methane peaksoverlap, the concentration of methanewill be incorrectly quantified.New HP PLOT-Q columns overcomesome of these problems making themsuitable for natural gas analyses. Thisapplication note examines a simpleGC/TCD mehtod for the analysis ofnatural gas using a new HP porouspolymer, Q-type, PLOT column. Theresolution of nitrogen and carbondioxide from methane on differentcommercially available PLOTcolumns is compared and reproducibility and reliability are evaluated.ExperimentalGas chromatography analysis of anatural gas sample was done using anAgilent 6890 series gas chromatograph (GC) with electronic pneumatics control (EPC) and a ThermalConductivity Detector (TCD). Forconventional gas analysis, a six-portvalve with an 0.25 cc sampling loopwas used to introduce natural gassample onto the HP-PLOT Q columnin split mode (split ratio 18:1). TheGC parameters are listed in Table 1.A natural gas sample supplied byScott Specialty Gases, Inc,(Plumsteadville, PA) was used andthe original compounds and concentrations are listed in Table 2. Thissample was modified by addingmethanol, water, and hydrogensulfide. During analysis, the possibleleaking of some air in the samplingloop may also have caused somechange in concentrations.Analyses were run using an HP-PLOTQ porous polymer column (part numachieved on these two kinds of PLOTcolumns. Additionally, water, CO2,and odorants deactivate Al2O3 andmolesieve PLOT column coatings.Therefore, these interactions causeshifting of retention times therebyaffecting the repeatability, reliability,and accuracy of the natural gasanalysis.Porous polymer, Q-type PLOTcolumns combine the separation features of the Al2O3 PLOT and molesieve PLOT columns when separatingfeatures of the Al2O3 PLOT and molesieve PLOT columns when separatingalkanes and fixed gases. The PLOT-Qcoating overcomes the reproducibilityproblem caused by polar compoundsdeactivating Al2O3 and molesieveabsorbent coatings in natural gassamples.Additionally, PLOT-Q columns canseparate CO2, water, and odorantsfrom an alkanes matrix. Thus, theanalysis of natural gas on PLOT-Qcolumns will satisfy most the separation requirements from BTUs throughhydrocarbon components and polarcompound determinations.However, there are also some problems associated with the use of PLOTQ columns for natural gas analysis.Fixed gas (such as air, CO, and noblegases) cannot be separated on PLOTQ columns at above ambient temperatures. The upper temperature limitsare usually low (250°C) for most commercial PLOT-Q columns.For some commercial PLOT-Qcolumns, loose particle binding in thecoating, high column bleed, and thelimited resolution of nitrogen/air frommethane are major problems restricting their usefulness in natural gasanalyses. Loose particle binding inthe coating causes baseline spikingwhen the sampling valve is operatedor fast temperature ramping is used.High column bleed makes thesecolumns useful only at temperaturesbelow 250°C and this situationGC 6890 GC with EPCColumns 0.53 mm x 30 m PLOT-Q columnsCarrier Helium 8.6 ml/min @ 60°C, Constant flow modeOven 60°C (2 min) 30°C/min to 240°C (1 min)Injection Split mode, 250°C, 0.25 cc sampling loopeSplit flow 150 ml/minValve Valco 6-port valve, 0.25 cc sampling loopDetector TCDReference flow Helium, 30 ml/minAuxilary gas flow Helium, 3 ml/minTable 1. GC Experimental ConditionsCompound Concentration (v/v%)Nitrogen 2.500Methane 88.660Carbon Dioxide 3.000Ethane 3.520Propane 1.050iso-Butane 0.400n-Butane 0.400neo-Pentane 0.100iso-Pentane 0.150n-Pentane 0.150Hexane 0.050Heptane 0.020Table 2. Natural Gas Sampleber 19095P-QO4) with two otherbrands (X and Y) of Q-type PLOTcolumns used for resolution comparisons. All columns were conditionedat 250°C overnight per manufacturerrecommendation to reduce columnbleed.3Results and DiscussionsHP-PLOT Q type columns are coatedwith porous polymer particles madeof divinylbenzene and ethylvinylbenzene and can separate hydrocarbons
up to C14 as well as some polar compounds. Their upper isothermal and
programming temperature limits are
270°C and 290°C, respectively.
The separation of the constitutents in
the natural gas sample was done
using a porous polymer HP-PLOT Q
column as shown in Figure 1. The
analysis time for this run was 9 minutes. Hydrogen sulfide, water, and
methanol were well-separated from
ethane, propane and iso-butane.
Although baseline spiking is commonly associated with this analysis
for some commercially available
columns, no baseline spiking was
observed with the HP-PLOT Q
column, indicating that the stationary
phase of this PLOT column provides
excellent immobilization that can
withstand: fast oven temperature
ramping (30°C/min), a pressure
pulse generated from valve actuation, and carrier gas pressure ramping at constant flow mode. Resultant
column bleed was very low.
Limited resolution of nitrogen and
carbon dixoide from methane is
obtained using most commercial
PLOT-Q columns. To evaluate the resolution of the new HP-PLOT Q column (Figure 1), an HP-PLOT Q column and two other brands of PLOT-Q
columns (brand X brand Y) were
compared. All columns were 0.53 mm
internal diameter. The natural gas
sample size was 0.25 cc with a split
ratio of 18:1. Peak resolutions (Rs)
were calculated based on the formulae in (1) and the results listed in
Table 3.
• Where t
a and tb are the
retention times of peaks A
and B
• W
a(1/2) and Wb(1/2) are their
peak widths at half height,
respectively.
Peak resolution for N
2-air/methane
using the HP-PLOT Q column was
greater than 1.5 which is the conventional requirement for base line
separation, even at a 60°C initial
oven temperature. The resolution of
carbon dioxide from methane at
60°C on the HP-PLOT Q column is
40% higher than the same resolution
on the other two brands of PLOT-Q
columns tested. This separation
capability of the HP-PLOT Q column
also can sufficiently resolve nitrogen
and carbon dioxide from methane,
even if the methane peak is tailing
due to sample overload. The starting
temperature of 60°C also results in a
30% reduction in GC cycle time.
One of the concerns associated with
using PLOT columns for natural gas
analysis is reproducibility. It is well
known that — when using alumina
PLOT and molesieve PLOT columns
— the retention times for hydrocarbons shift due to deactivation of
R
s (A/B) =
2* (tb- ta)
1.7* (Wa(1/2)+Wb(1/2)
0 2 4 6 8 min
Methane
N
2-Air
CO
2
Figure 1. Separation of Natural Gas
Ethane
H
2S
H
2O
C3
Methanol
i-C4
n-C4
neo-C5
i-C5
n-C5
C6
C7
Column: 0.53 mm x 30 m, HP-PLOT Q
Carrier: Helium (8.6 ml/min @ 60°C)
Oven: 60°C (
正在翻譯中..