A finding that RCW 9 A. 04.050 does

A finding that RCW 9 A. 04.050 does not apply to juvenile courts would render that statute meaningless or superfluous contrary to rules of construction. Juvenile courts have exclusive jurisdiction over all individuals under the chronological age of 18 who have *24 committed acts designated criminal if committed by an adult. Declination of jurisdiction and transfer to adult court is limited to instances where it is in the best interest of the juvenile or the public. Thus, all juveniles who can avail themselves of the infancy defense will come under the jurisdiction of the juvenile court, and most will remain there. Implied statutory repeals are found not to exist where the two statutes can be reconciled and given effect . Goals of the Juvenile Justice Act of 1977 include accountability for criminal behavior and punishment commensurate with age and crime. RCW 13.40.010. A goal of the criminal code is to safeguard conduct that is not culpable. RCW 9 A. 04.020. The infancy defense which excludes from criminal condemnation persons not capable of culpable, criminal acts, is consistent with the overlapping goals of the Juvenile Justice Act of 1977 and the Washington Criminal Code.

結果 (繁體中文) 2:

如果認定RCW 9 A. 04.050不適用於少年法庭，則該規約將使其毫無意義或具有違反建築規則。少年法庭對18歲以下所有犯有24項犯罪行為的個人擁有專屬管轄權，如果這種行為是由成年人犯下的。管轄權的界定和移交成人法院僅限於符合少年或公眾最佳利益的情況。因此，所有能夠利用嬰兒期辯護的青少年將受少年法庭的管轄，而且大多數將留在那裡。在兩部法規可以調和和生效的情況下，就不存在隱含的法定廢除。1977年《少年司法法》的目標包括追究犯罪行為的責任和與年齡和犯罪相稱的懲罰。RCW 13.40.010.刑法的目標之一是保護不該有罪的行為。RCW 9 A. 04.020.將不能有罪的犯罪行為排除在刑事譴責之外的初級辯護符合1977年《少年司法法》和《華盛頓刑法》的重疊目標。

結果 (繁體中文) 3:

如果裁定RCW 9 A.04.050不適用於少年法庭，則該法令將毫無意義或多餘，違反解釋規則。少年法庭對年齡在18歲以下的所有人擁有專屬管轄權，這些人如果是成年人犯下了24項被指定為犯罪的行為。管轄權的下降和移交給成人法院僅限於符合少年或公眾最佳利益的情况。囙此，所有能够利用嬰兒期辯護的青少年都將受到少年法庭的管轄，大多數將繼續留在那裡。在兩部法規能够協調並生效的情况下，默示的法定廢除並不存在。1977年《少年司法法》的目標包括追究與年齡和犯罪相稱的犯罪行為和懲罰責任。RCW 13.40.010號。《刑法》的一個目標是保護不應受到譴責的行為。RCW 9 A.04.020號。將不能犯罪的人排除在刑事定罪之外的嬰兒期辯護符合1977年《少年司法法》和《華盛頓刑法典》的重疊目標。